首页> 外文学位 >A Phenomenological Study of Factors that Influence Project Manager Efficacy: The Role of Soft Skills and Hard Skills in IT-Centric Project Environments.
【24h】

A Phenomenological Study of Factors that Influence Project Manager Efficacy: The Role of Soft Skills and Hard Skills in IT-Centric Project Environments.

机译:影响项目经理效率的因素的现象学研究:软技能和硬技能在以IT为中心的项目环境中的作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

One source of confusion around the factors that influence project manager efficacy already identified in the literature is the lack of clear agreement on definitions of success as viewed by different stakeholders in the context of project success, project management success, and project manager success. These are not subtle differences when making decisions related to hiring, professional development efforts, and curriculum development. The purpose of this phenomenological research was to identify what Senior IT Leaders and Certified Project Management Professionals (PMPs) identify as the most important attributes for project manager efficacy as it relates to project success. The first sub-question is whether there are differences in expectations between Senior IT Leaders who hire, assign, and develop their project managers, and Certified Project Management Professionals who execute projects. The second sub-question is whether contextual factors such as industry or organizational culture affect stakeholder skill rankings. The final sub-question is whether new project management modalities such as agile create different demands on project managers, resulting in new or changing perceptions of necessary skills and knowledge for project manager efficacy. Using a comparative focus group design with participants from three industry sectors, this study provides clear evidence of the factors these two stakeholder groups consider the most important contributors to project manager efficacy as it relates to project success and application of project management tools/knowledge. Contributions of findings extend beyond providing a list of skills project managers must acquire by providing a deeper understanding of priorities and contextual influences on perceived value in three categories; 1. IT knowledge and skills, 2. Interpersonal skills and 3. Project management methodology knowledge and application. The key lessons learned from this thesis research contribute to the overall body of knowledge in IT project management, as well as to practice. Key Finding 1: There is a clear skill category preference for project managers in an IT-centric project environment for both stakeholder groups, adding to our understanding of the potential conflicts and agreements between hiring, delegating or development managers and project managers. Key Finding 2: The skill category priorities related to factors that contribute to project success and attributes that contribute to project manager efficacy strengthened through collaborative discussion with peers, suggesting that research methods need to engage participants. Key Finding 3: Four specific attribute categories emerged as most important for project manager efficacy: facilitation skills, communication skills, leadership skills, and individual personality traits. Key Finding 4: While Senior IT Leaders considered IT knowledge and skills as "moderately important" contributors to project success, descriptions suggested a preference for general, or basic, IT knowledge rather than a specialized area of IT expertise. This finding may influence practitioners' decisions on resource allocation for project manager development. Key Finding 5: There were suggestions of industry influences on attributes influencing project manager efficacy during the initial group brainstorming. However, stakeholders did not include those attributes that varied between industries when ranking attributes in order of perceived importance, adding support for a group of key attributes that are expected of project managers for them to be effective across industries. Key Finding 6: Similarly, while the participants' suggest project manager efficacy is situational; this did not influence their skill category rankings or attributes most important for project manager efficacy. This reinforces support for key attributes of effective project managers. Key Finding 7: Agile project management approaches do create a different demand on project managers; however, participants were unanimous in their assertion that the attributes most important for project manager efficacy do not change in an agile project management environment. This is an important finding as it contradicts early anecdotal evidence. Each of these findings contribute to the body of research on project manager success, project success and project management success, as well as providing insights for practice and new thoughts for future research.
机译:关于已经在文献中确定的影响项目经理效力的因素,造成混淆的一个原因是,在项目成功,项目管理成功和项目经理成功的背景下,不同利益相关者对成功的定义缺乏清晰的共识。在做出有关招聘,专业发展工作和课程开发的决策时,这些差别并不是微不足道的。这项现象学研究的目的是确定高级IT主管和经认证的项目管理专业人员(PMP)将什么确定为与项目成功相关的项目经理效力的最重要属性。第一个子问题是,雇用,分配和发展其项目经理的高级IT主管与执行项目的认证项目管理专业人员之间的期望是否存在差异。第二个子问题是行业或组织文化等背景因素是否会影响利益相关者的技能排名。最后一个子问题是敏捷等新的项目管理模式是否对项目经理产生了不同的需求,从而导致对项目经理效力所需技能和知识的新的或不断变化的看法。使用来自三个行业部门的参与者进行的比较焦点小组设计,这项研究提供了清晰的证据,证明这两个利益相关者小组认为与项目成功和项目管理工具/知识的应用有关的因素是项目经理效力的最重要因素。结果的贡献不仅仅提供了项目经理必须提供的技能列表,还可以通过更深入地了解优先级和背景因素对三类感知价值的影响; 1. IT知识和技能,2.人际交往能力和3.项目管理方法论的知识和应用。从本论文研究中汲取的关键经验教训有助于IT项目管理的整体知识以及实践。主要发现1:在以IT为中心的项目环境中,对于两个利益相关者群体,项目经理都有明确的技能类别偏好,这加深了我们对招聘,委派或开发经理与项目经理之间潜在冲突和协议的理解。主要发现2:通过与同行的协作讨论,与有助于项目成功的因素和有助于项目经理效力的属性相关的技能类别优先级得以提高,这表明研究方法需要吸引参与者。主要发现3:四个特定的属性类别对项目经理的效能最重要:协助技巧,沟通技巧,领导能力和个人人格特质。关键发现4:尽管高级IT领导者认为IT知识和技能是项目成功的“中度重要”的贡献者,但描述表明他们偏爱一般或基本的IT知识,而不是IT专业知识的专门领域。这一发现可能会影响从业人员对项目经理开发资源分配的决策。关键发现5:在最初的小组集思广益期间,有人提出行业对影响项目经理效率的属性的影响。但是,当按感知重要性的顺序对属性进行排名时,利益相关者并没有包括那些在行业之间变化的属性,从而增加了对项目经理期望的一组关键属性的支持,以使他们在整个行业中都有效。关键发现6:类似地,尽管参与者的建议项目经理的效能取决于情况。这不会影响他们的技能类别排名或对项目经理效率最重要的属性。这加强了对有效项目经理关键属性的支持。关键发现7:敏捷项目管理方法的确对项目经理产生了不同的需求。但是,参与者一致认为,对于项目经理效率最重要的属性在敏捷项目管理环境中不会改变。这是一个重要发现,因为它与早期传闻证据相矛盾。这些发现中的每一个都有助于开展有关项目经理成功,项目成功和项目管理成功的研究,并为实践提供见识并为未来研究提供新思路。

著录项

  • 作者

    Millhollan, Chuck.;

  • 作者单位

    Syracuse University.;

  • 授予单位 Syracuse University.;
  • 学科 Information Science.;Information Technology.
  • 学位 D.P.S.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 303 p.
  • 总页数 303
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号