首页> 外文学位 >STUDIES IN 'THE OTHER HARMONY': PROSE GENRES IN THE LATER ENGLISH RENAISSANCE.
【24h】

STUDIES IN 'THE OTHER HARMONY': PROSE GENRES IN THE LATER ENGLISH RENAISSANCE.

机译:“其他和谐”中的研究:后期英语再造中的散文体裁。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation establishes a context in Renaissance literary theory and practice for the study of generic form in seventeenth-century nonfiction prose. The Introduction analyzes the problems in this study as well as defines the principles on which genre criticism is based, identifying both its usefulness and its potential dangers as an approach to literary study. Chapter I, then, focuses on Renaissance literary theory specifically. Of particular interest are those issues suggesting a relaxed sense of the distinctions between prose and poetry as types of literary expression. The debate over the necessity of verse in poetry broadly defined; the various understandings of the doctrine of imitation; the rise of Platonic concepts of literary art; and the influence of rhetorical standards on literature are among those issues. Chapter I examines this critical context as necessary background to the study of prose genres.;Recovering from these sources a system of generic principles for prose is primarily a historical endeavor, but it is also critical. Identifying a genre is not in itself a valuable exercise unless we can apply that model to our understanding of a text. Chapter III, then, analyzes in detail John Donne's Devotions Upon Emergent Occasions as an example of a prose form mixed in kind. Combining the structure of the sermon with the technique of exemplary narrative, Donne's work provides a redefinition of the devotional manual, a generic experiment that at once raises a subliterary genre to a more literary one and illuminates more clearly its devotional purpose.;In the old quarrel between ars and ingenium, it seems to be the fact of experience that ingenium plays a major part; it is equally true that creative activity is influenced by the means of expression available to a writer in his historical period. Ultimately, then, we are making an argument which congratulates a literary culture as much as an individual writer. In the late Renaissance, three main factors in the literary culture contribute to the development of prose genres: the relaxed distinction between prose and poetry as literary types, the attraction of mixed genres, and the tendency in humanist literary theory and practice to raise to the status of art forms never officially recognized in the "rules" for literary composition. The conclusion of this study recapitulates these basic points, using them to direct an analysis of genre in Browne's Urne-Burial. The interplay between these two forces, the dynamic contact between the individual writer and his literary culture, defines the vitality of generic experiments in seventeenth-century nonfiction prose.;The pervasive interest in genre evidenced in all literary discussions of the period combines with the relaxed distinctions between prose and poetry to suggest the operation of generic principles in prose forms. Chapter II examines the Renaissance concepts of genre, paying particular attention to the idea of mixed kinds. Despite the continued interest in prose in the Renaissance, however, the literary theorists only rarely discuss prose forms according to generic principles. Thus, we need to look beyond the formal theoretical discussions in order to determine our generic constructs. For evidence of these generic principles, we must turn to the literature itself. Chapter II continues its analysis of prose genre through an examination of some of those forms actually practiced by the writers of the period: the dialogue, the epistle, and the essay. The attempt here is to develop an understanding of genre applicable to nonfiction prose, a critical definition based on both the theoretical discussions of the period, and the implicit evidence of the literature itself.
机译:本文为十七世纪非小说散文的通用形式研究奠定了文艺复兴时期文学理论和实践的背景。引言分析了本研究中的问题,并定义了体裁批评所基于的原则,并确定了其作为文学研究方法的有用性和潜在危险。然后,第一章重点讨论文艺复兴时期的文学理论。特别令人感兴趣的是那些问题,暗示了人们对散文与诗歌之间作为文学表现形式的区别的一种放松的感觉。关于诗歌诗歌必要性的辩论得到了广泛的界定;对模仿学说的各种理解;柏拉图文学艺术观念的兴起;修辞标准对文学的影响就是其中之一。第一章将这种批判性背景作为散文类型研究的必要背景进行研究。从这些来源中恢复散文通用原则体系主要是一项历史性的尝试,但也是至关重要的。除非我们可以将该模型应用于我们对文本的理解,否则确定类型本身并不是一项有价值的工作。然后,第三章详细分析了约翰·多恩(John Donne)的《紧急场合的献身》,以一种混合形式的散文形式为例。结合讲道的结构和典范的叙事技巧,多恩的工作重新定义了灵修手册,这是一种普通的实验,它立即将一种副文学体裁提高到了一种文学体裁,并更清楚地阐明了其灵修的目的。在ars和Ingenium之间发生争执,似乎事实是Ingenium发挥了主要作用;同样地,创造性活动受作家在其历史时期可用的表达方式的影响。最终,我们正在提出一种论证,它与个人作家一样,都对文学文化表示祝贺。在文艺复兴后期,文学文化的三个主要因素促成散文体裁的发展:散文与诗歌之间作为文学类型的放松区分,混合体裁的吸引力以及人文主义文学理论和实践发展为散文的趋势。艺术形式的地位从未在文学创作的“规则”中得到正式认可。这项研究的结论概括了这些基本点,并利用它们指导了Browne的Urne-Burial的体裁分析。这两种力量之间的相互作用,即个人作家与他的文学文化之间的动态联系,定义了17世纪非小说散文中泛型实验的生命力。该时期所有文学讨论中都表现出对流派的普遍兴趣与悠闲相结合。散文与诗歌之间的区别,以暗示散文形式的通用原则的运作。第二章研究文艺复兴时期的体裁概念,特别注意混合体的概念。尽管文艺复兴时期继续对散文产生兴趣,但文学理论家很少根据通用原则讨论散文形式。因此,我们需要超越正式的理论讨论来确定我们的通用结构。为了证明这些通用原则,我们必须转向文献本身。第二章通过考察这段时期的作家实际实践的某些形式,继续对散文体裁的分析:对话,书信和散文。这里的尝试是发展对适用于非小说散文的体裁的理解,这是基于该时期的理论讨论和文献本身隐含证据的批判性定义。

著录项

  • 作者

    IMBRIE, ANN ELIZABETH.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.;

  • 授予单位 The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.;
  • 学科 English literature.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1979
  • 页码 228 p.
  • 总页数 228
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:51:38

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号