首页> 外文学位 >STUDIES IN COST ALLOCATION AND EFFICIENCY EVALUATION.
【24h】

STUDIES IN COST ALLOCATION AND EFFICIENCY EVALUATION.

机译:成本分配和效率评估研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This thesis explores some new possibilities in approaches to the problems of cost allocation and efficiency evaluation. These include consideration of issues of "equity" and "efficiency" that arise in the allocation of costs of common facilities to individual users, and extend to development of new techniques for dealing with existence of jointness and returns-to-scale encountered in efficiency evaluations and production cost variance analysis.; The issues of "fairness" and "equity" in cost allocations are addressed by means of an axiomatic framework that integrates a variety of different approaches to cost allocation stemming from information theory and game theory and comprehending commonly used practices in industrial cost accounting. The idea is to allow for considerations such as fairness and equity which may be important from the standpoint of maintaining organization relations but which have heretofore escaped attention in criticisms levelled at them from the standpoint only of individual decision making under economic theory. The analysis is further extended to integrate reformulated Shapley Value axioms from game theory with the axioms underlying traditional cost allocation principles to cover joint cost situations.; With this as background, the problem of economic efficiency is then reexamined in the context of the full cost allocation model that underlies these common industrial costing practices. An information economics model considers the use of full cost allocations to elicit information from the user divisions about the benefits derived by them from a common service. The use of such an information system is shown to increase the expected value of the aggregate decision to provide or discontinue a common service when the corporate management is assumed to have imperfect information aabout the benefits derived by the user divisions.; A second model is constructed to formally incorporate the possibility of enhancing the efficiency of the divisions in the utilization of a common resource, so that efficiency improvement may enable the divisions to obtain the same benefits from a smaller amount of the common resource. The question of determining the optimal amount to charge for a common resource is analyzed within this framework. Contrary to the conclusions reached by the usual economic analyses of the cost allocation problem, it is shown that the allocation of marginal costs would not, in general, lead to the maximization of the overall corporate profits.; The thesis also reports results of a field study of existing cost allocation practices at two large industrial organizations which are decentralized in a manner comparable to what has been visualized as a guide to the formal analyses. The idea of the field study was to utilize an in-depth on-the-site interview approach as a basis for understanding what might lie behind some of the practices employed in these two corporations and to obtain additional insight by eliciting the "views" of corporate and divisional managers on the purposes served by cost allocation schemes in large decentralized organizations.; Finally, the problem of efficiency evaluation is addressed within this thesis by means of still another framework afforded by a new approach for efficiency measurement suggested by A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper and E. Rhodes. Alternative game theoretic and production economics interpretations of their approach are provided to extend this method of efficiency measurement to situations involving non-constant returns to scale, and develop a new conceptual framework for analyzing production cost variances.
机译:本文探讨了解决成本分配和效率评估问题的新方法。这些包括考虑在将公共设施的费用分配给个人用户时出现的“公平”和“效率”问题,并扩展到开发新技术,以处理效率评估中所存在的联合和规模回报问题。和生产成本差异分析。通过公理框架解决成本分配中的“公平”和“公平”问题,该框架整合了各种不同的成本分配方法,这些方法基于信息论和博弈论,并理解了工业成本会计中的常用做法。这个想法是考虑到诸如公平和公平之类的考虑因素,这些因素从维护组织关系的角度来看可能很重要,但迄今为止,从仅基于经济理论的个人决策的角度出发,在针对它们的批评中一直没有引起人们的注意。分析进一步扩展为将博弈论中重新制定的Shapley价值公理与传统成本分配原则基础的公理相结合,以涵盖联合成本情况。以此为背景,然后在作为这些常见的工业成本核算方法基础的完整成本分配模型的背景下,重新研究了经济效率问题。信息经济学模型考虑使用全部成本分配来从用户部门中获取有关他们从共同服务中获得的收益的信息。当公司管理被假定具有关于用户部门所带来的利益的不完善信息时,这种信息系统的使用被证明可以增加提供或终止一项公共服务的总体决策的期望值。构造第二种模型,以正式纳入在公共资源利用中提高部门效率的可能性,以便提高效率可以使部门从较少数量的公共资源中获得相同的收益。在此框架内分析了确定公共资源最佳充电量的问题。与通常的经济分析对成本分配问题得出的结论相反,它表明,边际成本的分配通常不会导致公司整体利润最大化。本文还报告了对两个大型工业组织的现有成本分配实践的现场研究结果,这些实践以与可视化作为形式化分析指南的可视化方式相当的方式进行了分散。实地研究的想法是利用深入的现场访谈方法作为基础,以了解这两家公司所采用的某些实践背后可能存在的问题,并通过引起企业的“观点”来获得更多的见解。大型分散组织中按成本分配计划服务的目的的公司和部门经理。最后,本文通过A. Charnes,W。W. Cooper和E. Rhodes建议的一种新的效率测量方法提供的另一个框架来解决效率评估的问题。提供了对它们的方法的替代博弈论和生产经济学解释,以将这种效率度量方法扩展到涉及规模收益不恒定的情况,并开发了一种用于分析生产成本差异的新概念框架。

著录项

  • 作者

    BANKER, RAJIV DUSHYANT.;

  • 作者单位

    Harvard University.;

  • 授予单位 Harvard University.;
  • 学科 Business Administration Accounting.
  • 学位 D.B.A.
  • 年度 1980
  • 页码 220 p.
  • 总页数 220
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 财务管理、经济核算;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号