...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy >On the efficiency, exergy costs and CO2 emission cost allocation for an integrated syngas and ammonia production plant
【24h】

On the efficiency, exergy costs and CO2 emission cost allocation for an integrated syngas and ammonia production plant

机译:关于综合的合成气和氨生产装置的效率,火用成本和CO2排放成本分配

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This paper presents an exergy and environmental assessment of a 1000 metric t/day ammonia production plant based on the steam methane reforming (SMR) process, including the syngas production, purification (CO2 capture) and compression units, as well as the ammonia synthesis and purge gas treatment. An integrated heat recovery system produces power and steam at three pressure levels, besides exporting hot water, CO2 and fuel gas, with no additional heat or power consumption being required. Two configurations for ammonia refrigeration process (-20 degrees C) are compared in terms of power consumption. Exergy cost data for upstream processing stages of natural gas is used to calculate the extended exergy cost of the products of the plant, namely ammonia, CO2 and fuel gas. Moreover, an appropriated methodology is employed to properly allocate the renewable and non-renewable exergy costs, as well as the CO2 emissions of the reforming, shift and furnace stack among the products of the plant. By considering that the cost reduction of the combustion gases is a linear function of the exergy flow rate reduction in each component of the heat recovery system, an improved allocation of the CO2 emission cost along the convection train is performed. A breakdown of the total exergy destruction rate of the plant (136.5 MW) shows that about 59% corresponds to the reforming process followed far behind by the ammonia synthesis and condensation (18.3%) and the gas purification units (13.2%). The overall exergy efficiency of the ammonia plant is calculated as 66.36%, which is enhanced by recovering the hydrogen-rich and fuel gases in the purge gas treatment process. The total and non-renewable exergy costs and CO2 emission cost of the ammonia produced are calculated as 1.7950 kJ/kJ and 0.0881 kg(CO2)/MJ, respectively. In addition, a rational exergy cost of 1.6370 kJ/kJ and CO2 emission cost of 0.0821 kg(CO2)/MJ are allocated to the CO2 gas, which can be supplied as feedstock to an associated chemical plant (urea, methanol, polymers, etc.). (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:本文介绍了基于蒸汽甲烷重整(SMR)工艺的1000公吨/天氨水生产厂的火用和环境评估,包括合成气生产,提纯(CO2捕获)和压缩装置,以及氨合成和吹扫气体处理。集成的热回收系统除了输出热水,CO2和燃气之外,还可以在三个压力水平下产生电力和蒸汽,而无需额外的热量或功耗。比较了氨制冷过程的两种配置(-20摄氏度)的功耗。天然气上游加工阶段的火用成本数据用于计算工厂产品(即氨,CO2和燃气)的扩展火用成本。此外,采用适当的方法来适当分配可再生能源和不可再生能源的成本,以及在工厂产品之间分配重整,转换和炉膛烟囱的二氧化碳排放量。通过考虑燃烧气体的成本降低是热回收系统的每个组件中的火用流量降低的线性函数,可以改善沿对流链的CO2排放成本分配。电厂总火用破坏率(136.5兆瓦)的细目分类显示,约有59%对应于重整过程,紧随其后的是氨合成和冷凝(18.3%)和气体净化装置(13.2%)。氨厂的总火用效率经计算为66.36%,可通过在吹扫气处理过程中回收富氢和燃料气来提高。所产生的氨的总和不可再生的火用成本和CO2排放成本分别计算为1.7950 kJ / kJ和0.0881 kg(CO2)/ MJ。此外,合理的火用成本为1.6370 kJ / kJ,CO2排放成本为0.0821 kg(CO2)/ MJ分配给CO2气体,可以将其作为原料供应给相关的化工厂(尿素,甲醇,聚合物等) )。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号