首页> 外文学位 >AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF WEAK-FORM MARKET EFFICIENCY FOR THE POST WORLD WAR II PERIOD, 1947-1981
【24h】

AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF WEAK-FORM MARKET EFFICIENCY FOR THE POST WORLD WAR II PERIOD, 1947-1981

机译:1947年至1981年第二次世界大战后时期疲软形式市场效率的实证测试

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this study, four trading rules which have been widely used in earlier studies were tested along with a newly developed trading rule over a time period with a very different stock price structure than that used in most of the earlier studies. The new rule is different from the other tested rules in that it is designed to capture cyclical swings, if any, but at the same time to avoid the distortions of numerous short swings in price movement. The time series used are 30 randomly selected individual stock price sequences (daily).;The results were quite positive. We found that in terms of net rate of return, the newly developed decision rule defeats its comparative rule, the buy-and-hold rule, by a comfortable margin over the time periods tested (1966 - 1977 and 1966 - 1981). Of the five tested decision rules, only the newly developed rule outperforms the buy-and-hold rule; the other four widely used rules, by varying degrees, perform worse.;We also apply the new rule to the S&P 500 stock composite index over the entire post-World War II period (1951 - 1981) and two subperiods. The results show that during subperiod one, from January 1951 to December 1965, the new trading rule was substantially outperformed by the buy-and-hold rule. However, during subperiod two, from January 1966 to December 1981, the result is totally different: the buy-and-hold result was outperformed by the new trading rule by a comfortable margin.;In all, by using two tests we have confirmed that the testing results of most of the former studies are correct. However, we have also shown that their results are very much time-period specific. This means that their results should be used to draw a general conclusion about market efficiency very cautiously. In addition, when it comes to drawing a conclusion about the weak-form market efficiency of the American capital market, the evidence compiled in this study, especially the results for the period January 1966 to December 1977, is probably more convincing than earlier studies.
机译:在本研究中,测试了在早期研究中已广泛使用的四种交易规则,以及在一段时间内股价结构与大多数早期研究中所使用的完全不同的新开发的交易规则。新规则与其他经过测试的规则不同之处在于,新规则旨在捕获周期性波动(如果有),但同时又避免了价格波动中众多短线波动的扭曲。使用的时间序列是30个随机选择的单个股票价格序列(每日)。我们发现,在净收益率方面,新开发的决策规则在测试的时间段(1966年至1977年和1966年至1981年)中以比较可观的优势击败了其比较规则(即买入并持有规则)。在五个经过测试的决策规则中,只有新制定的规则胜过购买并持有规则;其他四个广泛使用的规则在不同程度上表现较差。我们还将新规则应用于第二次世界大战后整个时期(1951年至1981年)和两个子时期的S&P 500股票综合指数。结果表明,在1951年1月至1965年12月的子时期中,新的交易规则大大超过了买入并持有规则。但是,在第二阶段(1966年1月至1981年12月)中,结果完全不同:新交易规则的买入和持有结果的表现差强人意;总而言之,通过两次测试,我们证实了大多数以前的研究的测试结果是正确的。但是,我们还表明,它们的结果在很大程度上取决于时间段。这意味着应谨慎使用其结果得出关于市场效率的一般结论。此外,在得出关于美国资本市场弱势市场效率的结论时,本研究中收集的证据,尤其是1966年1月至1977年12月的结果,可能比以前的研究更具说服力。

著录项

  • 作者

    CHEN, DEE-FU.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Kentucky.;

  • 授予单位 University of Kentucky.;
  • 学科 Finance.
  • 学位 D.B.A.
  • 年度 1983
  • 页码 172 p.
  • 总页数 172
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:51:29

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号