首页> 外文学位 >VALIDATION OF A COGNITIVE TAXONOMY-HIERARCHY DESCRIBING BEHAVIORAL OUTCOMES OF INSTRUCTION: THE DOMAIN OF COGNITION (LEARNING, THINKING, INFORMATION-PROCESSING).
【24h】

VALIDATION OF A COGNITIVE TAXONOMY-HIERARCHY DESCRIBING BEHAVIORAL OUTCOMES OF INSTRUCTION: THE DOMAIN OF COGNITION (LEARNING, THINKING, INFORMATION-PROCESSING).

机译:验证描述性行为结果的分类分类法的层次:认知领域(学习,思考,信息处理)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The present study incorporated three parts which were conducted in order to determine how valid the Domain of Cognition was in respect to: (1) the sequence of its levels, (2) its applicability to classroom instruction, and (3) its accuracy in terms of describing the outcome behaviors of students as a result of instruction.;In Part 2, pre- and inservice teachers were asked to read specific behavioral objectives and match them to the levels of the Domain of Cognition. Part 2 results revealed that pre- and inservice teachers could match specific behavioral objectives to the levels of the Domain of Cognition with a high degree of accuracy, the only exception being those associated with level 8. Chi-square analysis revealed that 40 out of 48 objectives were classified at, above or significantly close to a 90% accuracy level.;In Part 3, a "variety-in-experiential-background" was provided to 5th and 6th graders who were then given an immediate posttest the same day and a delayed posttest approximately 23-24 hours later. The results from this study indicated that outcome behaviors as described by the Domain of Cognition on the day new information is presented are not as distinct from each other as compared with behaviors 23-24 or more hours later. On the immediate posttest, one-way ANOVA revealed that significant differences were found only between mean scores on Reception: Recognition and the other three sublevels tested. A Kendall's Tau Correlation coefficient of .33 (p = .38) was obtained which indicated that the order of immediate posttest outcome behaviors did not match the criterion order in the Domain of Cognition. On the delayed posttest, one-way ANOVA revealed that all sublevel mean scores were significantly different from each other. A Kendall's Tau Correlation coefficient of 1.00 (p < .05) was obtained indicating that the order of delayed posttest outcome behaviors perfectly matched the criterion order in the Domain of Cognition.;In Part 1, subjects were asked to take randomly arranged descriptions of levels and place them in order from lowest to highest. The results of Part 1 revealed that pre- and inservice teachers could sequence the levels of the Domain of Cognition with a high degree of accuracy based only upon the descriptions given. Kendall's Tau Correlation coefficients of 1.00 were obtained (p < .0001) after using the median and mode of subjects' responses in comparison to the criterion order as found in the Domain of Cognition.
机译:本研究包含三个部分,它们是为了确定认知域在以下方面的有效性:(1)其级别的顺序;(2)其在课堂教学中的适用性;(3)其术语的准确性在第2部分中,要求学前和在职教师阅读特定的行为目标,并将其与认知领域的水平相匹配。第2部分的结果表明,职前和在职教师可以将特定的行为目标与认知领域的水平高度准确地匹配,唯一的例外是与8级相关的那些。卡方分析显示,在48个中,有40个目标被分类为,高于或明显接近90%的准确度水平。;在第3部分中,向5年级和6年级的学生提供了“经验背景的多样性”,然后在同一天立即进行了事后测试,延迟约23-24小时后的测试。这项研究的结果表明,与23-24小时或更长时间后的行为相比,在提供新信息的当天,认知领域所描述的结果行为并没有那么明显。在即时后测中,单向方差分析显示,仅在“接收:识别”的平均得分与所测试的其他三个子级别之间发现了显着差异。 Kendall的Tau相关系数为.33(p = .38),表明立即测试后结果行为的顺序与认知域中的标准顺序不匹配。在延迟的后测中,单向方差分析显示所有次平均得分均存在显着差异。获得的Kendall的Tau相关系数为1.00(p <.05),表明延迟的测试后结果行为的顺序与认知域中的标准顺序完全匹配。;在第1部分中,要求受试者对水平进行随机排列的描述并按从低到高的顺序排列它们。第1部分的结果表明,职前和在职教师仅根据给出的描述就可以高度准确地对认知域的等级进行排序。与受试者在认知域中发现的标准顺序相比,使用受试者反应的中位数和模式后,得出的肯德尔的Tau相关系数为1.00(p <.0001)。

著录项

  • 作者

    MURPHY, GARY THOMAS.;

  • 作者单位

    Arizona State University.;

  • 授予单位 Arizona State University.;
  • 学科 Curriculum development.
  • 学位 Educat.D.
  • 年度 1984
  • 页码 285 p.
  • 总页数 285
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号