首页> 外文学位 >NEO-CONSERVATISM: AN ANALYSIS OF ITS CAUSES AND ETHNIC BASIS.
【24h】

NEO-CONSERVATISM: AN ANALYSIS OF ITS CAUSES AND ETHNIC BASIS.

机译:新保守主义:原因分析和民族基础。

获取原文

摘要

This dissertation deals with the development of neo-conservatism among American intellectuals during the late 1960s and 1970s. The contention is that neo-conservatism is basically an ethnic phenomenon. Jewish intellectuals constituted a disproportionately large number of the neo-conservatives. This was no mere coincidence. Jewish issues and Jewish interests are believed to be the reasons that these thinkers grew more conservative. Had Jewish interests in America not changed during the late sixties, the movement would never have developed.; The hypothesis that was tested was that a major part of the shift of the Jewish neo-conservatives from liberal to conservative could be accounted for by changes in their ethnic group's interests. A counter-hypothesis was that any shift in their ethnic group's interests had little or nothing to do with the changed political and social beliefs of the neo-conservatives. Another counter-hypothesis was that the neo-conservatives' ethnic interests did not change during the period when their political and social beliefs shifted to the right. A third counter-hypothesis was that the interests of American Jews did not change during the period of the study.; The research method was to conduct a content analysis of all the articles written by a sample of intellectuals over the period from 1962 to 1977. The articles were evaluated in terms of their political stance. The articles were also evaluated for any reference to ethnic interests. The sample of intellectuals were divided into three groups: Jewish neo-conservatives who were liberals in 1962 but conservatives by 1977, Jewish liberals who remained so, and non-Jewish neo-conservatives.; After examining the articles, it became apparent that Jewish interests were a critical factor in the shift to neo-conservatism. Jewish interests had changed during the period of the study, and they had grown increasingly conservative. After documenting the impact of these interests, the counter-hypotheses were rejected and the hypothesis was supported.
机译:本文论述了1960年代末和1970年代末美国知识分子中新保守主义的发展。争论是新保守主义基本上是一种种族现象。犹太知识分子在新保守主义者中所占比例不成比例。这绝非偶然。人们认为犹太问题和犹太利益是这些思想家变得更加保守的原因。如果在60年代后期犹太人对美国的兴趣没有改变,该运动将永远不会发展。检验的假设是,犹太新保守派从自由派向保守派转变的主要部分可以归因于他们种族利益的变化。一个相反的假设是,他们民族利益的任何改变都与新保守主义者的政治和社会观念的改变几乎没有关系。另一个相反的假设是,新保守主义者的种族利益在他们的政治和社会信仰向右转移的时期没有改变。第三个相反的假设是,在研究期间,美国犹太人的利益没有改变。研究方法是对1962年至1977年期间一个知识分子样本撰写的所有文章进行内容分析。对这些文章的政治立场进行评估。还对这些文章进行了评估,以提及种族利益。知识分子样本分为三类:1962年是自由主义者的犹太新保守主义者,到1977年成为保守派的犹太新保守主义者,仍然如此的犹太自由主义者,以及非犹太新保守主义者。在审查了这些文章之后,很明显,犹太人的利益是向新保守主义转变的关键因素。在研究期间,犹太人的兴趣发生了变化,并且变得越来越保守。在记录了这些利益的影响之后,反假说被拒绝了,这一假设得到了支持。

著录项

  • 作者

    ABRAMS, LANNIE KIP.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Chicago.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Chicago.;
  • 学科 Sociology Ethnic and Racial Studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1984
  • 页码
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 民族学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号