首页> 外文学位 >EISENHOWER'S CONDITIONAL CRUSADE: THE EISENHOWER ADMINISTRATION AND CIVIL RIGHTS, 1953-1957
【24h】

EISENHOWER'S CONDITIONAL CRUSADE: THE EISENHOWER ADMINISTRATION AND CIVIL RIGHTS, 1953-1957

机译:艾森豪威尔的条件性困境:艾森豪威尔的行政管理和公民权利,1953-1957年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Many recent accounts have argued for a reappraisal of Dwight D. Eisenhower. He was not an inarticulate incompetent who delegated away the power of the presidency. Indeed, the facts argue for an opposite conclusion. Nor was Eisenhower the reactionary portrayed in early revisionist accounts. Particularly on the issue of civil rights, his views were complex, and often ambiguous. While clinging firmly to his conviction that primary authority in this field belonged to the states, he nonetheless believed it wrong to deny economic or political rights to anyone because of race, religion, or national origin. Although he shared many southern preconceptions about blacks and race relations, bigotry was alien to his personality. Moreover, his personal attitudes were refracted through his perception of his duty as President. Eisenhower considered it his duty to use the authority of the presidency to insure both equality of opportunity and that the federal government did nothing to support segregation.;Traditionally, historians have considered the 1950s as a hiatus, a time when the government withdrew from civil rights, awaiting the return of a Democrat to the White House. In fact, the Eisenhower years witnessed great advances in civil rights. In the sixteen months before the Supreme Court's decision in Brown v Board of Education, Eisenhower ordered and effected an end to segregation in the District of Columbia and the armed forces. He also sought to eradicate discrimination practiced by the government and its contractors, and appointed blacks in unprecedented numbers to unprecedented high places in the executive branch. Although he harbored serious misgivings about the Court's decision in Brown, he never questioned the Court's authority or his own duty to enforce its decrees. He did believe, however, that, to be effective, desegregation should take place very gradually, while allowing time for attitudes to change. Along those lines, he and his administration sponsored and pushed through Congress the first civil rights legislation since Reconstruction; and, by appointing liberals and moderates to the federal judiciary, Eisenhower insured an ongoing, but by the nature of the legal system, gradual process of desegregation in the South.
机译:最近的许多报道都主张对德怀特·D·艾森豪威尔进行重新评估。他不是一个无礼的无能的人,下放了总统的权力。确实,事实证明了相反的结论。艾森豪威尔(Eisenhower)的反动派也没有在早期修正主义者的叙述中刻画。特别是在民权问题上,他的观点是复杂的,而且常常是模棱两可的。尽管他坚信自己在这一领域的主要权威属于国家,但他仍然认为由于种族,宗教或民族血统而剥夺任何人的经济或政治权利是错误的。尽管他分享了许多关于黑人和种族关系的南方偏见,但偏执对他的性格格格不入。此外,他对总统职责的理解反映了他的个人态度。艾森豪威尔(Eisenhower)认为有责任利用总统职位的权力来确保机会均等,联邦政府也没有采取任何措施来支持种族隔离。 ,等待民主党返回白宫。实际上,艾森豪威尔时代见证了公民权利的巨大进步。在最高法院在“布朗诉教育委员会”一案中作出判决前的十六个月中,艾森豪威尔下令并结束了在哥伦比亚特区和武装部队的种族隔离。他还试图消除政府及其承包商的歧视,并以空​​前的人数任命黑人到行政部门的空前职位。尽管他对法院在布朗的判决存有严重的疑虑,但他从未质疑过法院执行其法令的权力或自己的职责。但是,他确实相信,要有效地进行种族隔离,就必须逐步进行,同时要留出时间来改变态度。沿着这些思路,他和他的政府发起并推动了国会重建以来的第一部民权立法;艾森豪威尔(Eisenhower)通过任命自由主义者和温和派加入联邦司法机构,确保了南部地区正在进行的,但由于法律制度的性质而逐步实行的种族隔离进程。

著录项

  • 作者

    MAYER, MICHAEL S.;

  • 作者单位

    Princeton University.;

  • 授予单位 Princeton University.;
  • 学科 American history.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1984
  • 页码 525 p.
  • 总页数 525
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号