首页> 外文学位 >FEDERAL LAW, CASE LAW, OHIO LAW AND ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY/PROCEDURES OF OHIO SCHOOLS DEALING WITH PARENTS OF CHILDREN FROM SEPARATED AND DIVORCED FAMILIES.
【24h】

FEDERAL LAW, CASE LAW, OHIO LAW AND ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY/PROCEDURES OF OHIO SCHOOLS DEALING WITH PARENTS OF CHILDREN FROM SEPARATED AND DIVORCED FAMILIES.

机译:联邦法律,判例法,俄亥俄州法律以及俄亥俄州儿童与父母分开处理的家庭的行政政策/程序。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this study was to inquire into the policy/procedures used by Ohio public school administrators to deal with the rights of parents who are separated or divorced, and identify federal, state and case law that grants certain accessibilities to custodial, joint custodial and noncustodial parents as they relate to their child's education.;The results of this study indicated that most Boards of Education do not have written policy to inform parents of their rights in the education of their children. The registration forms of most districts do not request the name, address and phone number of the joint custodial or noncustodial parent. Most written policy/procedures that do exist are not in total compliance with the requirements of the federal and state laws relating to access to records.;Neither state nor federal agencies monitor public school compliance and, as a result, not ALL parents are being advised of or granted their rights. Annual notices of written policy are not forwarded to all parents; therefore, parents are not aware of their rights or the procedures which may be followed to enforce them. Administrators are denying the joint custodial and noncustodial parents their rights related to their child's educational records. Reasons for denial indicate that administrators are not aware of the regulations of the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, Ohio Privacy Act and the Students Records Act.;A questionnaire was developed, pilot tested, validated and used to survey the Ohio public school superintendents or their designee.
机译:这项研究的目的是探究俄亥俄州公立学校管理者用来处理分居或离婚的父母的权利的政策/程序,并确定联邦,州和判例法,以赋予监护权,联合监护权和监护权一定的可及性。非监护父母,因为他们与子女的教育有关。这项研究的结果表明,大多数教育委员会都没有书面政策来告知父母其子女教育的权利。大多数地区的登记表都不要求联合监护人或非监护人父母的姓名,地址和电话号码。确实存在的大多数书面政策/程序并不完全符合联邦和州法律关于获取记录的要求。;州和联邦机构均未监督公立学校的合规性,因此未向所有父母提供建议拥有或被授予权利。书面政策的年度通知不会转发给所有父母;因此,父母并不了解自己的权利或执行这些程序所应遵循的程序。管理员拒绝共同监护和非监护父母与其孩子的教育记录有关的权利。拒绝的原因表明管理者不了解《家庭教育权利和隐私权法》,《俄亥俄州隐私权法》和《学生记录法》的规定。制定,调查,验证并用于调查俄亥俄州公立学校负责人的问卷调查表或他们的指定人。

著录项

  • 作者

    DAMRON, GENEVA MARINE.;

  • 作者单位

    Kent State University.;

  • 授予单位 Kent State University.;
  • 学科 Educational administration.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1985
  • 页码 158 p.
  • 总页数 158
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:51:07

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号