首页> 外文学位 >RIGHTS OF FUTURE GENERATIONS CONCERNING GENETIC HERITAGE (EUGENICS, JOEL FEINBERG, WRONGFUL BIRTH, CONCEPTION, PARADOX INDIVIDUALS).
【24h】

RIGHTS OF FUTURE GENERATIONS CONCERNING GENETIC HERITAGE (EUGENICS, JOEL FEINBERG, WRONGFUL BIRTH, CONCEPTION, PARADOX INDIVIDUALS).

机译:与遗传遗产有关的未来一代的权利(遗传学,乔尔·芬伯格,残酷的出生,概念,悖论者)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Many writers argue that future persons cannot have rights because they do not exist now. Therefore, they cannot be our equals. Derek Parfit argues that future persons cannot claim that past persons have violated their rights. If actions of past persons alter the genetic identity of future persons, then they would not exist at all. It is argued that Parfit's view is incorrect. In such cases it is our duty to reason as if there is some real person or other at some temporal distance from us whom we must take precautions not to harm. Moreover, future persons are real, determinate persons. It would be as wrong to discriminate against them as it would be to discriminate against those at spatial distance.;The limitations of predictions in human genetics are reviewed, and a brief history of the misuses of information in genetics to support public policy in eugenics is given. It is argued that no wholescale public program in eugenics should be supported. But, individuals need to make responsible reproductive choices. Lineal descendants have rights not to be harmed by severely debilitating genetic conditions. Moreover, every immature person has rights to be nurtured, and parents have duties to care for children born to them. They have duties not to conceive or in some cases not to give birth to children who would be harmed by genetic diseases.;In accord with Joel Feinberg, rights are interpreted as valid claims to have our interests fulfilled. If it is known in advance that all of a particular future person's basic interests have been destroyed before he or she is born, then that person has a right not to be born. With respect to genetic heritage, some inherited conditions, notably anencephaly, Tay-Sachs syndrome, and Lesch-Nyhan syndrome, do destroy all the basic interests of a person before he or she is born. Such individuals have rights not to be born. Other genetic conditions harm a child and may be a wrong her if such a condition could have been prevented by parents or others responsible for her conception or birth.
机译:许多作家认为,未来的人不能拥有权利,因为他们现在不存在。因此,它们不能成为我们的平等。德里克·帕菲特(Derek Parfit)辩称,未来的人不能声称过去的人侵犯了他们的权利。如果过去人的行为改变了未来人的遗传身份,那么他们将根本不存在。有人认为,帕菲特的观点是不正确的。在这种情况下,我们有责任推理,就好像某个真实的人或其他人与我们有一定距离,我们必须采取预防措施以免造成伤害。而且,未来的人是真实的,决定性的人。歧视他们和歧视空间距离的人都是错误的。回顾了人类遗传学预测的局限性,并简要介绍了遗传学信息滥用以支持优生学公共政策的历史。给定的。有人认为,不应支持优生学的整体公共计划。但是,个人需要做出负责任的生殖选择。直系后代有权不受严重破坏遗传条件的伤害。此外,每个未成熟的人都有受养的权利,父母有责任照顾他们所生的孩子。他们有义务不怀胎,或在某些情况下不生育受遗传疾病伤害的儿童。;根据乔尔·费恩伯格,权利被解释为实现我们的利益的有效主张。如果事先知道某个特定未来人的所有基本利益在他或她出生之前就已经被摧毁,那么该人有权不出生。关于遗传遗产,某些遗传条件,尤其是无脑,泰-萨克斯氏综合症和勒希-尼汉氏综合症,确实破坏了一个人出生前的所有基本利益。这些人有不出生的权利。其他遗传疾病会伤害儿童,如果父母或其他负责其生育或生育的人可以预防这种疾病,可能是错的。

著录项

  • 作者

    GEORGE, KATHRYN PAXTON.;

  • 作者单位

    Washington State University.;

  • 授予单位 Washington State University.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1985
  • 页码 201 p.
  • 总页数 201
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号