首页> 外文学位 >THE AXIOLOGY AND METHODOLOGY OF CRITICAL ORGANIC MARXISM.
【24h】

THE AXIOLOGY AND METHODOLOGY OF CRITICAL ORGANIC MARXISM.

机译:批判性有机马克思主义的价值论和方法论。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Contrary to the dominant doctrine in the social sciences today, no social science is objective or "value free." Science is a product of society. Currently, scientific values are a-critical towards its maker. This implies a positive, and thus conservative, evaluation of the status quo.; Marxian social science is both scientific and critical. Marxian social science turns its attention on its maker, society, not only for the purpose of understanding, but to criticize and improve its maker. Because it does not shrink from criticism, it is controversial, misrepresented, and misunderstood.; I have written this Dissertation to clarify the assumptions and principles of Marxian social science. The a-critical positivistic paradigm dominates both Soviet-Marxian and bourgeois social science. In the Dissertation I show how orthodox Marxism fell under the control of that paradigm. Since mid-twentieth century, many European Marxists have been struggling to break out of their positivistic constraints. I critically analyze this Western Marxist movement.; Only since the nineteen-sixties have scholars in the United States begun to take Marxism seriously. Prior to this they wrote as bourgeois propagandists bent on misrepresenting Marx. The American wing of the Western Marxist movement has produced organic Marxism. But this too has vestiges of positivism in it.; My Dissertation removes all traces of positivism from Marxism and creates "critical organic Marxism." Marx wrote that "man must be the supreme being for man." From this I derive the two value axioms which guided Marx's thought throughout his career. These axioms are the locus of gravity in Marx's value-rich social science. The two axioms are: first, people are more important than things; and, second, people are more important than ideas. My arguments are buttressed with extensive textual analyses.; With these elements of Marx's social scientific method clarified, scholars in the future will be able to apply his principles uniformly. This public availability of Marx's method is the primary reason why it is a science.
机译:与当今社会科学中占主导地位的学说相反,没有任何社会科学是客观的或“无价值的”。科学是社会的产物。当前,科学价值对其制造商至关重要。这意味着对现状的积极评估,因此是保守的评估。马克思社会科学既科学又批判。马克思主义社会科学将注意力转移到其制造者社会上,这不仅是为了理解目的,而且是批评和改进其制造者。因为它不会因批评而退缩,所以是有争议的,被歪曲的和被误解的。我写这篇论文是为了阐明马克思主义社会科学的假设和原理。非批判的实证主义范式在苏维埃马克思主义和资产阶级社会科学中占主导地位。在论文中,我展示了正统的马克思主义如何落入该范式的控制之下。自20世纪中叶以来,许多欧洲马克思主义者一直在努力摆脱实证主义的束缚。我批判性地分析了这一西方马克思主义运动。直到19世纪60年代,美国学者才开始认真对待马克思主义。在此之前,他们写的是资产阶级宣传家,他们倾向于歪曲马克思。西方马克思主义运动的美国派生了有机的马克思主义。但这也有实证主义的痕迹。我的论文从马克思主义中消除了所有实证主义的痕迹,并创造了“批判的有机马克思主义”。马克思写道:“人必须是人的至高无上”。由此,我得出了指导马克思整个职业生涯思想的两个价值公理。这些公理是马克思价值丰富的社会科学的引力所在。这两个公理是:第一,人比事物重要。其次,人比思想重要。我的论据得到大量文本分析的支持。在阐明了马克思社会科学方法的这些要素之后,未来的学者们将能够统一运用他的原理。马克思方法的这种公众可获得性是它成为一门科学的主要原因。

著录项

  • 作者

    KELLEHER, WILLIAM J.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Santa Barbara.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Santa Barbara.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1985
  • 页码 285 p.
  • 总页数 285
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 政治理论;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:51:09

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号