首页> 外文学位 >Post-Marxism after Althusser: A critique of the alternatives.
【24h】

Post-Marxism after Althusser: A critique of the alternatives.

机译:阿尔都塞之后的后马克思主义:对替代方法的评论。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation provides a particular Marxian class analytical political economy critique of post-Marxism. The dissertation demonstrates the ways in which different positions within post-Marxism continue to essentialize the conceptualizations of class and capitalist economy. What distinguishes this dissertation from other dominant critiques of post-Marxism is the anti-essentialist epistemological and ontological position it adopts. By adopting an anti-essentialist epistemological position the dissertation is able to demonstrate the discontinuities and continuities between post-Marxism and the Marxian tradition. The dissertation does this by reading the heterogeneous and disparate post-Marxian approaches as so many different ways to "resolve" the central tension of the Althusserian mode of production debate of the 1960s and 1970s: The tension between the desire to think the overdetermination of social reproduction and transformation and the effort to explain the stability of class domination. The dissertation argues one of the effects of this tension to be the lapse of the Althusserian mode of production problematic into reproductionism.;Drawing extensively on the scholarship of Ernesto Laclau and Etienne Balibar, the dissertation substantiates the ways in which the post-Althusserian post-Marxism has developed a critique of the reproductionist tendency of this problematic and constructed a theory of the social that allows for conceiving social reproduction to be both provisionally stable and overdetermined. The dissertation argues, however, that such "resolutions" have failed in different ways to dislodge the constitution of class and capitalist reproduction from essentialist narratives, with the effect of restaging the ontological duality of the mode of production problematic (i.e., overdetermination vs. determinism qua reproductionism) in a new form: The contingency of politics and the necessity of class and capitalist reproduction. After showing the limitations of some of the prominent positions within post-Althusserian post-Marxism, the dissertation concludes with an alternative post-Althusserian Marxian perspective, initially developed by Stephen Resnick and Richard Wolff, that provides an overdetermined understanding of social and economic reproduction from the entry point of class qua surplus.
机译:本文对后马克思主义进行了特殊的马克思主义阶级分析性政治经济学批判。论文论证了后马克思主义内部不同立场继续使阶级和资本主义经济概念化的方式。这篇论文与后马克思主义的其他主流批评的不同之处在于,它所采用的反必要论的认识论和本体论立场。通过采取反本质主义的认识论立场,本论文能够证明后马克思主义与马克思主义传统之间的不连续性和连续性。论文通过阅读异质而截然不同的后马克思主义方法来做到这一点,因为有许多不同的方法来“解决” 1960年代和1970年代的阿尔都塞式生产方式辩论的中心张力:认为社会的过度决定性的欲望之间的张力。繁殖和转化以及解释阶级统治稳定性的努力。论文认为,这种紧张关系的影响之一是使阿尔都塞式生产模式陷入有问题的再生产主义的消亡。马克思主义对这种问题的再生产趋势进行了批判,并构建了一种社会理论,该理论使人们认为社会再生产既是暂时稳定的又是过分确定的。然而,论文认为,这样的“决议”以不同的方式失败了,使阶级和资本主义再生产的构成从本质主义的叙述中脱颖而出,其结果是重新产生了有问题的生产方式的本体论对偶性(即,超决定论与决定论)。 qua再生产主义)以一种新形式出现:政治的偶然性以及阶级和资本主义再生产的必要性。在展示了后阿尔都塞里亚主义后马克思主义中某些重要立场的局限性之后,论文以史蒂芬·雷斯尼克和理查德·沃尔夫最初提出的后阿尔都塞里亚主义马克思主义观点作为结束,该观点提供了对来自剩余类的切入点。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ozselcuk, Ceren.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Massachusetts Amherst.;

  • 授予单位 University of Massachusetts Amherst.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.;Economics Theory.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 218 p.
  • 总页数 218
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 哲学理论;经济学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:37:50

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号