首页> 外文学位 >AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF DIFFERENTIAL TAX RATES AND TRANSACTION COSTS UPON COVERED INTEREST-RATE-PARITY.
【24h】

AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF DIFFERENTIAL TAX RATES AND TRANSACTION COSTS UPON COVERED INTEREST-RATE-PARITY.

机译:税率差异对不同税率和交易成本影响的实证分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The dissertation looks at the effects of several market imperfections on Covered Interest-Rate-Parity (CIRP). With perfect markets, the traditional CIRP condition implies a one-to-one correspondence between the forward premium and the weighted interest differential for all currency pairings. This arbitrage-enforced condition may be violated if taxes or transaction costs are present.;The effects of taxes on CIRP are also examined. Regression analysis is performed to test for differential tax effects and changing tax regimes. Only limited support is found for these types of tax effects.;The tax deductibility of transaction costs may reduce the size of the "neutral band". For the extreme case when marginal investors pay top corporate tax rates the number of observed deviations from CIRP which can be explained is reduced by approximately 30 percent.;We conclude that the marginal investor does not face differential tax rates and may be tax-exempt. If the marginal investor is not tax-exempt then a significant number of violations of CIRP occur which are not explained by either tax effects or transaction costs.;Our study examines CIRP between 9/72 and 5/83 with weekly observations at the 3-, 6-, and 12-month maturities. We examine the relationship for both the US/UK and the US/Canadian currency pairings. The results show transaction costs increasing with maturity when estimated using Bid-Asked spreads. The "neutral band" formed by transaction costs associated with covered interest-arbitrage explains over 90 percent of the observations. Only approximately 60 percent of the observations can be explained when "one-way" arbitrage sets the boundaries for the "neutral band".
机译:本文着眼于几种市场缺陷对担保利率平价(CIRP)的影响。对于完美的市场,传统的CIRP条件意味着远期权利金和所有货币配对的加权利息差额之间都是一一对应的。如果存在税收或交易成本,则可能违反这种套利条件。;还研究了税收对CIRP的影响。进行回归分析以测试差异税收影响和变化的税收制度。对于这些类型的税收影响,只能找到有限的支持。;交易成本的税收可抵扣性可能会减小“中立带”的规模。对于边际投资者支付最高公司税率的极端情况,观察到的可以解释的偏离CIRP的数量减少了大约30%。;我们得出的结论是,边际投资者不会面临差别税率,并且可以免税。如果边际投资者不是免税的,那么就会发生大量违反CIRP的行为,无论是税收影响还是交易成本都无法解释。我们的研究对9/72到5/83之间的CIRP进行了调查,并在3到3时每周观察,6个月和12个月的到期日。我们检查了美国/英国和美国/加拿大货币配对的关系。结果表明,使用买入价差计算的交易成本随着期限的增加而增加。 90%以上的观察结果是由交易成本与涵盖的利率套利相关的“中性区间”所解释的。当“单向”套利设定“中性频带”的边界时,只能解释大约60%的观察结果。

著录项

  • 作者

    STONE, GARRY BROOKS.;

  • 作者单位

    The Ohio State University.;

  • 授予单位 The Ohio State University.;
  • 学科 Economics Finance.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1985
  • 页码 167 p.
  • 总页数 167
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号