首页> 外文学位 >STUDENT AGE, QUALITY OF EFFORT, AND ESTIMATED GAINS FROM THE COLLEGE EXPERIENCE (INVOLVEMENT, OLDER, UNDERGRADUATES).
【24h】

STUDENT AGE, QUALITY OF EFFORT, AND ESTIMATED GAINS FROM THE COLLEGE EXPERIENCE (INVOLVEMENT, OLDER, UNDERGRADUATES).

机译:学生的年龄,工作质量和从大学经历中获得的估计收益(参与程度,年龄较大,大学生)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether student involvement and its relationship to estimated gains from the college experience differed by age.;A random sample grouped by age and sex was drawn from the population of all undergraduates at a large state university in resident instruction who lived off campus and had at least third-term standing. Data were collected by means of a telephone survey utilizing a modified version of Pace's College Student Experiences Questionnaire (1979). A 94 percent response rate was obtained (212 respondents).;A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed no significant difference between the younger and older undergraduates on the academic quality of effort scales (p < .05). A second ANOVA did indicate a significantly lower level of social effort on the part of older students. Area of study proved to be a more salient discriminant of academic quality of effort than either age or sex.;Only three relationships between effort and gains were found to differ significantly between the two age groups (Fisher's z transformation). The association between the topics, and level of younger undergraduates' conversations with peers and their gains in Intellectual Competencies was significantly stronger than it was for older students. The correlation between "writing experience" and gains in Understanding Science was slightly higher for older students, however. Older students' quality of effort and gains in General Education were highly correlated (p < .001).;The behavioral construct under investigation was quality of effort (Pace, 1979). Quality of effort refers to the investment of time and effort by students in their own learning and development. Eight areas of college life were examined: Academic/Intellectual Experience (i.e., "library experience", "experience with faculty", "course learning", and "writing experience") and Personal/Interpersonal Understanding (i.e., "personal experience", "student acquaintances", "topics of conversation", and "information in conversations").;A stepwise multiple correlation revealed that quality of effort was an important predictor of gains for both age groups. Academic effort and predictors contributed more for older undergraduates; social effort and predictors contributed more for younger students.
机译:这项研究的目的是调查学生的参与程度及其与从大学经历中获得的估计收益之间的关系是否因年龄而异。;根据年龄和性别分组的随机样本是从居民制教学中的一所大型州立大学的所有本科生中提取的他住在校园外,至少有第三学期的身分。通过电话调查,使用佩斯(Pace)的《大学生经历调查表》(1979)的修改版来收集数据。获得了94%的答复率(212名受访者)。双向方差分析(ANOVA)显示,在努力努力量表的学业质量上,年龄较小和年龄较大的本科生之间没有显着差异(p <.05)。第二次方差分析确实表明,年龄较大的学生的社会工作水平明显降低。研究领域被证明比年龄或性别对工作努力的学术质量有更明显的区别。在两个年龄组之间,只有努力和收获之间的三种关系存在显着差异(Fisher's z变换)。与年长的学生相比,主题,年轻的大学生与同龄人的对话水平以及他们在智力能力方面的联系之间的关联性显着增强。但是,年龄较大的学生的“写作经验”与理解科学知识的相关性略高。高年级学生的努力质量与通识教育的学习成绩高度相关(p <.001)。;被调查的行为结构是努力质量(Pace,1979)。努力质量是指学生在自己的学习和发展中投入的时间和精力。研究了大学生活的八个方面:学术/知识经验(即“图书馆经验”,“师资经验”,“课程学习”和“写作经验”)和个人/人际理解(即“个人经验”, “学生相识”,“话题”和“对话中的信息”)。逐步的多重相关揭示了努力的质量是两个年龄组收益的重要预测指标。学术努力和预测因素为年长的本科生做出了更多贡献;社会努力和预测因素对年轻学生的贡献更大。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    The Pennsylvania State University.;

  • 授予单位 The Pennsylvania State University.;
  • 学科 Education Higher.
  • 学位 D.ED.
  • 年度 1985
  • 页码 137 p.
  • 总页数 137
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号