首页> 外文学位 >Political discourse in exile: Karl Marx and the Jewish question of our times.
【24h】

Political discourse in exile: Karl Marx and the Jewish question of our times.

机译:流亡中的政治话语:马克思和我们时代的犹太人问题。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Karl Marx's philosophy of writing demands his readers help develop his theory by questioning its gaps and contradictions. A crucial question concerns Marx's relation to his Jewishness.;In "On the Jewish Question," Judaism stands for civil society and the transformative power of practical need, Christianity for the "political state" and spiritual solutions to material problems. Human emancipation will spring not from politics but "the negation of Judaism": recognizing and overcoming barriers to fully human existence.;Marx thus endorses a "Jewish" viewpoint which senses reality as the Hebrew bible does. The Torah conceives human beings in dialogue with God as indispensible partners in creating the world. We are called to act; our action matters. Marx criticizes the Greeks and most Western philosophers for their static, contemplative view of reality. Any ontology which imposes a truth beyond social relations privileges some people and needs, excluding others. By rejecting God, Marx discredits the God's-eye view that leads to false universals. He retains the structure of dialogue between the species and its evolving needs.;Hegel had offered the young Marx a dialectical approach to reality, but Marx eventually found Hegel's ontology too Greek. Rather than simply reversing Hegel, though, Marx corrects him as though he were subject to a Jewish worldview. Marx's method resembles the traditional Jewish style of hermeneutics called midrash. It performs the same function: restoring sense to a chaotic world as glimpsed from a particular tradition.;The breakdown of social meaning is central to Marx's theory of alienation. The Jewish theme of exile explains Marx's urgency. A group is exiled when society constructs reality to preclude it from expressing or acting upon the needs that constitute its identity. A society in exile frustrates the realization of human purposes. Both workers and capitalist society are exiled. To return, they must believe the world can become human--as their experience under capitalism shows it cannot.;Marx's personal exile is that his audience lacks the Jewish context to recognize his theory of how we become free. Theorists continue his work by listening to people in exile and working out different roads to emancipation.
机译:卡尔·马克思的写作哲学要求他的读者通过质疑其差距和矛盾来帮助发展他的理论。一个关键问题涉及马克思与他的犹太人的关系。在《关于犹太人的问题》中,犹太教代表公民社会和实际需要的变革力量,基督教代表“政治国家”,是物质问题的精神解决方案。人类的解放不是源于政治,而是源于“对犹太教的否定”:承认并克服人类完全生存的障碍。马克思因此赞同“犹太人”的观点,就像希伯来语圣经那样感知现实。 《摩西五经》认为人类与上帝对话是创造世界必不可少的伙伴。我们被要求采取行动;我们的行动很重要。马克思批评希腊人和大多数西方哲学家对静态的,沉思的现实观。任何强加于社会关系之外的真相的本体论都会使某些人和需要享有特权,而另一些人则除外。马克思拒绝了上帝,就把上帝的观点视作导致错误的普遍性的观点。他保留了物种及其不断发展的需求之间对话的结构。;黑格尔为年轻的马克思提供了一种对现实的辩证法,但马克思最终发现黑格尔的本体论过于希腊化。马克思并没有简单地颠倒黑格尔,而是纠正了他,好像他受到了犹太人的世界观一样。马克思的方法类似于传统的犹太诠释学风格,即米德拉什。它具有相同的功能:从特定的传统中窥见混乱世界的感觉。社会意义的崩溃是马克思异化理论的核心。犹太人流亡的主题解释了马克思的紧迫性。当社会建构现实以阻止其表达或根据构成其身份的需求行事时,一个群体就会被放逐。流亡社会阻碍了人类目的的实现。工人和资本主义社会都被流放。要返回,他们必须相信世界可以成为人类,正如他们在资本主义下的经验所表明的那样。马克思的个人流放是,他的听众缺乏犹太背景,无法认识到他关于我们如何获得自由的理论。理论家通过聆听流亡人士的声音并探索通往解放的不同道路来继续他的工作。

著录项

  • 作者

    Fischman, Dennis K.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Massachusetts Amherst.;

  • 授予单位 University of Massachusetts Amherst.;
  • 学科 Political science.;Philosophy of Religion.;Ethnic studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1988
  • 页码 221 p.
  • 总页数 221
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:50:55

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号