首页> 外文学位 >God and finitude: Toward a covenant of mutual affirmation.
【24h】

God and finitude: Toward a covenant of mutual affirmation.

机译:上帝与有限性:迈向相互肯定的盟约。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation offers an understanding of covenant for the rationalist thinker. Many of its ideas are rooted in process theology and the theologies of Mordecai M. Kaplan, David Hartman, and Abraham Joshua Heschel. In this work, I offer a summary and critique of each. I also present a constructive portion which I term "the covenant of mutual affirmation."; Kaplan's theology affirms the strengths of process thought and stresses a rational concept of God which is feels resolves many of the traditionally held contradictions concerning deity. Kaplan's understanding of revelation as our ongoing discovery of God's truth is in line with human experience. Kaplan understands human existence as worthwhile and meaningful, and God's sovereignty as functioning whenever we struggle to strengthen the good within and without us. Finally Kaplan offers on understanding of covenant, free of the idea of the chosenness of the Jews.; Hartman offers a rationalist approach to convenantal theology. Hartman is open to the realities of modernity and understands the omnipotence of God as being manifest in God's restraint from breaking into the natural order so that human freedom and responsibility may flourish.; Heschel takes note of the necessity of a rational basis for our theological thinking and creates an understanding of God's holy presence as both transcendent and immanent. For Heschel, awe and radical amazement are critical in building the pathway to religious faith. For him it is the unity of God and the inter-connectedness of everything that bring us to the awareness of God's omnipresence. For Heschel, existence deserves our gratitude to God.; In the final chapter, I offer ten articles of a covenant which affirms and celebrates the mutual finitude of God and humankind. It argues that the question of theodicy is not viable when deity is no longer understood as an intervening, omnipotent power. It understands that, finally, the responsibility for the good and evil that humans bring about rests on humankind. This covenant rejects the idea of Israel as God's chosen people, favoring instead the idea of Israel choosing God. It accepts the unity of ourselves, God and creation, and affirms God's awareness of all that we are and do. Finally, it understands the mission of the Jews as a struggle to help our species self-evolve toward a society rooted in justice and peace for all its members. (Abstract shortened with permission of author.)
机译:本文为理性主义思想家提供了对约的理解。它的许多思想都源于过程神学以及Mordecai M. Kaplan,David Hartman和Abraham Joshua Heschel的神学。在这项工作中,我对每项进行了总结和评论。我还提出了一个建设性的部分,我称之为“相互肯定的盟约”。卡普兰的神学肯定了过程思想的力量,并强调了上帝的理性观念,认为这种观念解决了许多传统上与神有关的矛盾。卡普兰对启示的理解是我们不断发现神的真理,这与人类的经验是一致的。卡普兰认为人类的生存是有价值和有意义的,而每当我们努力加强内部和外部的利益时,上帝的主权就会发挥作用。最后,卡普兰提出了对约的理解,摆脱了犹太人选择的观念。哈特曼为传统神学提供了一种理性主义的方法。哈特曼对现代性持开放态度,并理解上帝的万能,这体现在上帝克制自己进入自然秩序的束缚中,以使人类的自由和责任得以蓬勃发展。赫歇尔(Heschel)注意到我们的神学思想必须有一个合理的基础,并建立了对神的圣洁存在的超越和内在的理解。对于赫舍尔来说,敬畏和激进的惊奇对于建立通往宗教信仰的途径至关重要。对他而言,正是上帝的团结和一切事物的相互联系使我们意识到了上帝的无所不在。对于赫舍尔来说,存在值得我们感谢上帝。在最后一章中,我提供了十个有关盟约的文章,它们肯定并庆祝了上帝与人类的共同有限性。它认为,当神不再被理解为一种介入的,万能的力量时,神教的问题就不可行了。它明白,最后,人类带来的善与恶的责任在于人类。这个盟约拒绝以色列作为上帝的选民的想法,而是赞成以色列选择上帝的想法。它接受了我们自己,上帝和创造物的统一,并肯定了上帝对我们现在和所做的一切的认识。最后,它理解犹太人的使命是帮助我们的物种自我发展成一个以全体成员正义与和平为根基的社会的斗争。 (摘要经作者许可缩短。)

著录项

  • 作者

    Sugarman, Alvin Marx.;

  • 作者单位

    Emory University.;

  • 授予单位 Emory University.;
  • 学科 Religion General.; Religion Philosophy of.; Theology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1988
  • 页码 286 p.
  • 总页数 286
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 宗教;宗教理论、宗教思想;宗教;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号