首页> 外文学位 >Development and evaluation of a prototype expert system for forecasting models.
【24h】

Development and evaluation of a prototype expert system for forecasting models.

机译:开发和评估用于预测模型的原型专家系统。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The selection of forecasting methods is a difficult task for which an expert system would offer an alternative if it could translate decision making procedures obtained from human forecasting experts into an explicit repeatable computer program. This research consisted of: (1) the development of a prototype expert forecasting system, dubbed the Intelligent Advisor for Selection of Forecasting Methods (IASFM), using a rule based shell with 199 production rules; and (2) an evaluation of the IASFM using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) developed by Thomas L. Saaty in the 1970s.; The following seven criteria recommended by previous researchers are used by the IASFM to select one or more of thirty-seven available forecasting methods: (1) time horizon, (2) data pattern, (3) cost, (4) ease of use, (5) model characteristics, (6) minimum data requirement, and (7) accuracy. The use of a rule based shell facilitated the development of the IASFM in a very short time period without the knowledge of an artificial intelligence language such as Lisp or Prolog.; The AHP was used to evaluate the IASFM because it is a decision analysis method for multiple criteria decision making. The following seven categories were used in the evaluation: (1) decisions, advice, and performance; (2) reasoning; (3) discourse; (4) hardware environment; (5) efficiency; (6) ability to update; and (7) ease of use. Three Mississippi State University statisticians were the evaluators. The consistency ratio for each was less than ten percent, which is the usual criterion for an AHP evaluation. The IASFM was recommended by two evaluators, while one evaluator recommended the use of a human expert.
机译:预测方法的选择是一项艰巨的任务,如果专家系统可以将从人类预测专家那里获得的决策程序转换为明确的可重复计算机程序,则专家系统将提供另一种选择。这项研究包括:(1)使用具有199条生产规则的基于规则的外壳,开发了原型专家预测系统,该系统被称为智能预测方法选择顾问(IASFM); (2)使用Thomas L. Saaty在1970年代开发的层次分析法(AHP)对IASFM进行评估。 IASFM使用了以前的研究人员推荐的以下七个标准来选择37种可用的预测方法中的一种或多种:(1)时间范围,(2)数据模式,(3)成本,(4)易用性, (5)模型特征,(6)最低数据要求和(7)准确性。基于规则的外壳的使用在非常短的时间内就促进了IASFM的发展,而无需了解诸如Lisp或Prolog之类的人工智能语言。 AHP用于评估IASFM,因为它是用于多标准决策的决策分析方法。评估使用了以下七个类别:(1)决策,建议和绩效; (2)推理; (3)话语; (4)硬件环境; (5)效率; (6)更新能力; (7)易于使用。评估者为密西西比州立大学的三名统计学家。每种的一致性比率均不到10%,这是AHP评估的通常标准。 IASFM由两名评估人员推荐,而一名评估人员则建议使用人类专家。

著录项

  • 作者

    Park, Kwan Hee.;

  • 作者单位

    Mississippi State University.;

  • 授予单位 Mississippi State University.;
  • 学科 Business Administration Management.; Artificial Intelligence.
  • 学位 D.B.A.
  • 年度 1990
  • 页码 198 p.
  • 总页数 198
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 贸易经济;人工智能理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号