首页> 外文学位 >Student response to written teacher feedback in first-year composition: Defining what students find useful & whether they believe it improves their writing.
【24h】

Student response to written teacher feedback in first-year composition: Defining what students find useful & whether they believe it improves their writing.

机译:学生在第一年的作文中对书面老师反馈的反应:定义学生认为有用的内容以及他们是否认为这可以改善他们的写作。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this mixed-methods research study, the author investigated a group of first-year college students' responses to and uses of their teachers' written feedback on their draft writing in a First-Year Composition (FYC) course. The author also examined, through corpus analysis, these students' definitions of "useful written teacher feedback." Methods of data collection included surveying 37 students, interviews with three of those students, and review of the papers on which the interviewees received their teachers' feedback. Study results regarding students' experiences with, and responses to, written teacher feedback indicate that the students relied heavily on such evaluation to guide their revision processes because they believed that feedback improved their writing. Further, corpus analysis revealed that students defined "useful written teacher feedback" as that which engaged them in dialogue; was helpful/beneficial; necessary for improved writing skills; and explanatory/guiding. Study data from the three interviewees revealed four patterns regarding students' expectations of their writing teachers: (a) The novice writers expected their writing teachers to be expert-practitioners; (b) The students valued the final, graded product more than the revision process; (c) The students were unconcerned by appropriation of their writing; (d) The teachers' feedback did not have to be positive to be considered useful. The author discusses these patterns in conversation with extant scholarship, as well as further considerations of the study as a whole. This discussion is followed by suggestions that the dissertation findings hold both for the field of composition studies and her writing pedagogy. Finally, in conjunction with presenting the limitations of the study, the author provides areas of potential future research indicated by the study, as well as her concluding thoughts.
机译:在这项混合方法研究中,作者调查了一组一年级大学生在第一年作文(FYC)课程中对他们的草稿的反馈和对他们的老师书面反馈的利用。作者还通过语料库分析检查了这些学生对“有用的书面老师反馈”的定义。数据收集的方法包括对37名学生进行调查,对其中3名学生进行访谈以及对受访者收到其老师反馈的论文进行审查。有关学生对书面老师反馈的体验和响应的研究结果表明,学生严重依赖于此类评估来指导他们的修订过程,因为他们认为反馈可以改善他们的写作。此外,语料库分析表明,学生将“有用的书面老师反馈”定义为使他们参与对话的内容。是有益的/有益的;提高写作技巧所必需;和解释性/指导性。来自三名受访者的研究数据揭示了关于学生对写作老师的期望的四种模式:(a)新手作家期望他们的写作老师是专家从业者; (b)学生对最终分级产品的重视程度高于修订过程; (c)学生对写作不屑一顾; (d)教师的反馈不一定是积极的,才被认为有用。作者在与现有奖学金的讨论中讨论了这些模式,并对整个研究作了进一步的考虑。在讨论之后,提出了一些建议,即论文的研究结果既适用于作文研究领域,又适用于她的写作教学法。最后,结合提出研究的局限性,作者提供了该研究表明的潜在的未来研究领域以及她的结论。

著录项

  • 作者

    DeCapua, Sarah E.;

  • 作者单位

    Indiana University of Pennsylvania.;

  • 授予单位 Indiana University of Pennsylvania.;
  • 学科 Higher education.;Educational evaluation.;Rhetoric.;Language arts.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 288 p.
  • 总页数 288
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 宗教;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号