首页> 外文学位 >Identifying critical-entry teaching competencies for beginning special educators: The Delphi study.
【24h】

Identifying critical-entry teaching competencies for beginning special educators: The Delphi study.

机译:为初等特殊教育者确定批判性教学能力:Delphi研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Critical-entry competencies perceived as being necessary for beginning special educators working with students with learning or mild disabilities (LDM), or students with moderate or severe disabilities (MSD) were identified by two, 12 member panels, each consisting of six nominated expert classroom teachers and six nominated teacher educators. Each panel identified critical-entry competencies using a Delphi process with three rounds: (1) an initial identification of competencies, (2) a round of rating and (3) a round of re-rating. In round one, each panel member was randomly assigned to write competencies for three of six content areas: Instructional Methodology, Student Assessment, Programming for Inclusion, Collaboration and Consultation, Student Management, and Curriculum Development and Evaluation. The final sets of 133 (LDM) and 85 (MSD) critical-entry competencies achieved consensus by both classroom teachers and teacher educators.;The results indicated that for both panels, critical-entry competencies were perceived to fall within six foci: Instructional focus, Assessment focus, Curriculum focus, Student focus, Professional Communication focus, and Teacher focus.;The results substantiate current teacher training content for both disability levels studied, and further indicate a need to include training of other competencies which may only receive incidental consideration by teacher training programs at present. An examination of the competencies falling within Student focus, Professional Communication focus, and Teacher focus reveals that beginning special educators need to possess skills which may be currently considered to be within the domains of experienced and consultant teachers. The implications may show a need to refocus teacher training efforts in order to graduate teachers with more sophisticated teaching characteristics.
机译:由两个,12名成员组成的小组确定了入门学习能力,这些能力被认为是开始与学习或轻度残疾(LDM)或中度或重度残疾(MSD)学生合作的特殊教育者所必需的,每个小组由六个提名的专家教室组成教师和六名提名的教师教育者。每个小组使用Delphi流程通过三轮来确定关键项能力:(1)能力的初步识别;(2)一轮评级;(3)一轮重新评级。在第一轮中,每个小组成员被随机分配为六个内容领域中的三个写作能力:教学方法论,学生评估,包容性编程,合作与咨询,学生管理以及课程开发和评估。最后一组133(LDM)和85(MSD)的关键项能力在课堂老师和教师教育者之间达成了共识。结果表明,对于两个小组,关键性项能力都被认为属于六个焦点:教学重点,评估重点,课程重点,学生重点,专业沟通重点和教师重点。结果证实了当前针对两种残疾水平的教师培训内容,并进一步表明需要包括其他能力的培训,而这些能力只能通过偶然的考虑而得到考虑。目前的教师培训计划。对以学生为重点,以专业沟通为重点和以教师为重点的能力的检查表明,刚开始的特殊教育者需要具备的技能可能目前被认为是经验丰富的顾问型教师。这意味着可能需要重新集中教师的培训工作,以使研究生教师具有更复杂的教学特征。

著录项

  • 作者

    Clayton, Mark Jonathon.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.;

  • 授予单位 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.;
  • 学科 Special education.;Teacher education.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1992
  • 页码 323 p.
  • 总页数 323
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号