首页> 外文学位 >Politics and the family: Locke's transformation of the family in the 'Two Treatises of Government'.
【24h】

Politics and the family: Locke's transformation of the family in the 'Two Treatises of Government'.

机译:政治与家庭:洛克在《政府两论》中对家庭的改造。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation examines Locke's discussion of the family and shows how it relates to his political thought as a whole. I do this by means of a textual analysis of the relevant sections of Locke's Two Treatises of Government. In the early chapters of this dissertation, I focus primarily on the First Treatise, where this theme is treated most comprehensively, considering both the broad topic of patriarchal rule and the more specific question of how Locke's attack on patriarchy affects the family. I then proceed to an analysis of Locke's treatment of the family in the Second Treatise and show how it fits together with the argument of the First Treatise, on which it is largely based. I argue that Locke's concern with developing a theory of politics that would maximize freedom from absolute, arbitrary rule is the informing principle of his entire political philosophy. The connection between absolute rule and the family is evident in Locke's attack on patriarchy in the First Treatise. It is simultaneously a critique of despotic rule by fathers in private families and of despotic rule by monarchs which was traditionally likened--by Filmer and others--to the rule of a father over his household.;I argue, moreover, that the existence of the family poses a considerable problem for Locke's premise of individual autonomy. If people exist in family groups in the state of nature, or the family and the state of nature co-exist as Locke admits later in the Second treatise (pars. 105-107), how can Locke argue that human beings are naturally free, equal and autonomous? I argue that Locke tries to resolve this problem by interpreting family life in such a way as to weaken its communal structure in order to make it conform as much as possible with Locke's basic premise that people are naturally free, equal and autonomous individuals.;By arguing for joint parental (rather than paternal) authority, limiting parental power to each child's period of dependence, attacking primogeniture and patriarchal authority over the extended family or clan, limiting conjugal power, accepting divorce and championing property rights for women, Locke mounts a devastating attack on patriarchy. In its place, Locke's reforms would create a smaller, less stable family, which over time will dissolve into economically and politically independent adults--resembling the free, equal and autonomous individuals of Locke's state of nature--among whom authority can be established only by consent or contract.
机译:本文考察了洛克关于家庭的论述,并显示了其与他的政治思想整体的关系。我是通过对洛克的《两个政府论》的有关部分进行文本分析来做到这一点的。在本文的前几章中,我主要关注《第一论》,该主题被最全面地处理,既考虑了父权制统治的广泛主题,又考虑了洛克对父权制的攻击如何影响家庭的更具体的问题。然后,我将对《第二论》中洛克对家庭的待遇进行分析,并展示其与《第一论》的论点如何契合,而《论第一论》是该论据的主要依据。我认为洛克对发展一种政治理论的关注是最大的免于绝对,任意统治的自由,这是他整个政治哲学的指导原则。洛克在《第一论》中对父权制的抨击证明了绝对统治与家庭之间的联系。这同时是对私人家庭中父亲的专制统治和君主专制统治的批评,传统上被电影人和其他人比作父亲在其家庭中的统治;此外,我认为存在洛克的个人自主权前提下,家庭成员构成了一个相当大的问题。如果人们以自然状态存在于家庭群体中,或者家庭与自然状态并存,正如洛克后来在《第二篇专论》(第105-107段)中所承认的那样,洛克如何辩称人类是自然自由的,平等和自治?我认为洛克试图通过解释家庭生活以削弱其社区结构的方式来解决这个问题,以使其尽可能符合洛克自然的自由,平等和自治的基本前提。洛克主张建立父母(而不是父母)共同的权力,将父母的权力限制在每个孩子的抚养期内,对大家庭或家族的长子继承权和父权制进行攻击,限制夫妻的权力,接受离婚并捍卫妇女的财产权,这使洛克遭受了毁灭性的打击。攻击父权制。取而代之的是,洛克的改革将建立一个较小的,不稳定的家庭,随着时间的推移,这个家庭将分解为经济上和政治上独立的成年人,类似于洛克自然状态的自由,平等和自治的个人,其中只有权威才能建立通过同意或合同。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    Yale University.;

  • 授予单位 Yale University.;
  • 学科 Political science.;Philosophy.;Individual family studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1993
  • 页码 408 p.
  • 总页数 408
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号