首页> 外文学位 >The rule of fear: The impact of Anabaptist 'terror', 1534-1535.
【24h】

The rule of fear: The impact of Anabaptist 'terror', 1534-1535.

机译:恐惧法则:洗礼“恐怖”的影响,1534-1535年。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

As one of the most appalling events of the sixteenth century, the Anabaptist reign of Munster (1534/35) stimulated a wave of reactions throughout the Holy Roman Empire, rendering a revealing commentary on political and religious concerns in the 1530s. In a highly charged political climate--the establishment of the Schmalkaldic League, Philip of Hesse's lightning recovery of Wurttemberg, and uprisings in northern Germany--rulers feared that "Munster" would provide the occasion to redraw the political map of Europe. Yet, notwithstanding its potential for generating a political and religious revolution, the shocking experience acted as a profound stabilizing factor. The event struck one decisive chord with the political leaders; the conviction that, like the peasant revolt ten years earlier, the rising of the Munsterites would launch the general rebellion of the common man. This terrifying prospect united Catholic and Protestant troops before the gates of Munster.;In each of the areas here investigated--Cologne, the Rhineland, and Strasbourg--"Munster" led to a change in policy toward heretics, although at different times. Despite the confessional differences between Cologne and Strasbourg, their many similarities in political concerns and strategies call into question the traditional stark division made between imperial cities according to their Catholic or Protestant allegiance.;"Munster's" impact was also, overall, one of reinforcement for prevailing religious convictions: for Strasbourg's ministers and Cologne's Carthusians, the event consolidated rather than shattered their established interpretive systems. The reception of "Munster" did, however, reveal some surprising stances: curiously, the Dominicans in Cologne, veterans of the Catholic campaign against Luther during the 1520s, took a back seat in combatting the Anabaptist reign.;"Munster" demonstrated the sensitivity of sixteenth-century society to anything which challenged the traditional order. The widespread outrage over the introduction of polygamy, the community of goods, and the elevation of the tailor Jan van Leiden to king was directed toward the Munsterites' demolition of societal structure. With "Munster," Germany clearly rejected any communal notions that the Anabaptist reign may have introduced. Rather, the experience of "Munster" became a catalyst for absolutist government.
机译:作为16世纪最骇人听闻的事件之一,明斯特的再洗礼统治(1534/35)激起了整个神圣罗马帝国的一波反响,对1530年代的政治和宗教关切发表了深刻的评论。在激烈的政治气氛中-建立了沙马尔卡尔迪克联盟,黑森的菲利普·黑森伯格恢复符腾堡,以及德国北部的起义-统治者担心“芒斯特”将为重绘欧洲政治版图提供机会。然而,尽管它具有引发政治和宗教革命的潜力,但令人震惊的经历仍是一个深刻的稳定因素。这一事件引起了政治领导人的决定性的共鸣。人们坚信,像十年前的农民起义一样,芒斯特人的崛起将引发普通人的普遍叛乱。这种可怕的前景使天主教徒和新教徒的军队在芒斯特的大门前联合起来。;在这里调查的每个地区(科隆,莱茵兰和斯特拉斯堡),“芒斯特”都改变了对异教徒的政策,尽管时间不同。尽管科隆和斯特拉斯堡在ess悔上有所不同,但它们在政治问题和战略上的许多相似之处使人们怀疑帝国城市之间根据天主教或新教徒的忠诚做出的传统鲜明划分。“芒斯特”的影响总体上也是对科隆的强化之一。普遍的宗教信仰:对于斯特拉斯堡的部长和科隆的迦太基人来说,这次活动巩固而不是破坏了他们已经建立的解释体系。然而,“蒙斯特”的接待确实揭示了一些令人惊讶的立场:奇怪的是,科隆的多米尼加人是1520年代反对路德的天主教运动的退伍军人,在反洗礼统治的战斗中退居第二位。十六世纪的社会对任何挑战传统秩序的事物都有影响。人们对一夫多妻制的引入,商品共同体以及裁缝扬·凡·莱顿(Jan van Leiden)升为国王的普遍愤慨是针对芒斯特人对社会结构的破坏。德国显然以“蒙斯特”(Munster)拒绝了洗礼统治时期可能引入的任何公共观念。相反,“蒙斯特”的经历成为了专制政府的催化剂。

著录项

  • 作者

    Haude, Sigrun.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Arizona.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Arizona.;
  • 学科 History European.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1993
  • 页码 434 p.
  • 总页数 434
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号