首页> 外文学位 >Assessment of psychopathology among Chinese American psychiatric inpatients.
【24h】

Assessment of psychopathology among Chinese American psychiatric inpatients.

机译:华裔美国精神病患者心理病理学评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Current knowledge on symptom assessment of Asian American psychiatric populations has several shortcomings. Little effort has been made to study the severely mentally ill. Clinical descriptions often lack empirical validation. Several methodological considerations, such as (1) using measures generated for and normed on non-Asian American populations without examining the psychometric properties of these instruments for Asians, (2) using only one instrument, and (3) the inadequacy of measure translations into Asian languages for non-English proficient respondents, place further constraints on research development in this area. The current study attempted to examine the reliability, validity, and utility of the commonly used SCL 90-R, PSS, and BPRS when used with adult Chinese American psychiatric inpatients. Also of interest were the relationships of the clinical descriptions derived from the instruments which utilize the patient and two independent clinicians as respondents. Seventy subjects completed the battery within their first week at the San Francisco General Hospital Asian psychiatric ward. Four-fifth of them used the Chinese translations. The SCL 90-R yielded good reliability and utility as a general psychopathology symptom self-report measure. However, its contrasting-diagnostic-group validity for the Chinese sample was marginal. The PSS was more complicated to administer, score, and interpret, and showed only moderate reliability. Given future effort to improve its reliability, however, the PSS demonstrated sufficient criterion-related validity to warrant use. Lastly, the BPRS was the most easily administered and scored, and seemed most compatible with clinicians' needs. However, its reliability and validity outcomes were the most limited. Its use was questioned. Findings on symptom descriptions of the sample, the relationships between measure outcomes and demography, conceptual and methodological issues, and recommendations for future research were also discussed.
机译:当前关于亚裔美国人精神病患者症状评估的知识有几个缺点。研究严重精神疾病的工作很少。临床描述通常缺乏经验验证。几种方法上的考虑,例如(1)使用针对非亚裔美国人生成并针对非亚裔美国人制定的衡量标准,而不检查这些工具对亚洲人的心理计量特性,(2)仅使用一种手段,以及(3)衡量标准翻译不足非英语熟练受访者的亚洲语言进一步限制了该领域的研究发展。当前的研究试图检查与成年华裔美国精神病患者一起使用时常用的SCL 90-R,PSS和BPRS的可靠性,有效性和实用性。同样令人感兴趣的是从利用患者和两名独立临床医生作为应答者的仪器得出的临床描述之间的关系。七十名受试者在第一周内在旧金山综合医院亚洲精神病房完成了电池。其中五分之四的人使用中文翻译。 SCL 90-R具有良好的可靠性和实用性,可作为一般的心理病理症状自我报告措施。然而,其对中国样本的对比诊断组有效性是微不足道的。 PSS的管理,评分和解释更为复杂,并且仅显示中等可靠性。但是,考虑到未来提高其可靠性的努力,PSS表现出足够的与标准相关的有效性,因此可以保证使用。最后,BPRS是最易于管理和评分的,并且似乎最符合临床医生的需求。但是,其信度和效度结果最为有限。它的使用受到质疑。还讨论了样本症状描述的发现,测量结果与人口统计学之间的关系,概念和方法问题以及对未来研究的建议。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wang, Grace Chen-Shin.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Los Angeles.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Los Angeles.;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Mental Health.;Psychology Clinical.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1993
  • 页码 134 p.
  • 总页数 134
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号