首页> 外文学位 >The evolution of European technological cooperation: The institutional economics of collaborative R&D.
【24h】

The evolution of European technological cooperation: The institutional economics of collaborative R&D.

机译:欧洲技术合作的演变:协作研发的制度经济学。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The thesis investigates European collaborative research and development policies. Since 1980, a considerable scope of collaborative behavior has emerged among European technical and business communities. An array of mechanisms fosters that cooperation--e.g., billions of dollars in public subsidies, changing laws and property rights regimes, and evolving social norms that favor collective activities. Why?;Several converging factors explain this story. In the "technology gap" 1960s, the European policy response to the American challenge was large "national champion" firms, trade protected and subsidized, aimed at taking advantage of multinational markets and economies of scale. These insular policies were at odds with broader efforts to integrate Europe. By the early 1980s a new external threat emerged: Japanese firms overtook significant portions of information technology industries. The national champions had not kept pace.;The threat came with a new policy model. Drawing lessons (now questioned) from the Japanese, business and governments worldwide began experimenting with collaborative approaches to innovation. Moreover, intra-European collaboration fostering policies such as ESPRIT and EUREKA--despite little evidence that they have helped European competitiveness--gain substantial support as one mechanism for increasing the social, political and economic integration of Europe.;The thesis also examines the design of European collaborative R&D policies through three theoretical approaches. First, models of R&D market failures explain how policymakers see innovation as central to economic growth, and why they seek R&D scale economies, risk spreading and broad dissemination of results. Second, an embeddedness model stresses the importance to innovation and technology diffusion of sustained personal relationships and their social contexts. It illuminates the policy emphasis on firms' abilities to access and creatively apply external sources of technology.;The third, social capital, approach views the policies to be as much about teaching collaborative social institutions as about providing technologies. They explicitly aim to make intra-European technology sharing a behavioral norm, part of everyday business routines. In this, the policies dovetail especially well with the deeper socio-political ideologies of European integration, which the European Union was founded to promote.
机译:本文研究了欧洲的合作研发政策。自1980年以来,欧洲技术和商业社区之间出现了相当多的协作行为。一系列机制促进了这种合作-例如数十亿美元的公共补贴,不断变化的法律和产权制度以及不断发展的有利于集体活动的社会规范。为什么?;几个趋同因素解释了这个故事。在1960年代的“技术差距”中,欧洲对美国挑战的政策回应是大型的“国家冠军”公司,受到贸易保护和补贴,旨在利用跨国市场和规模经济。这些孤立的政策与欧洲一体化的更大努力背道而驰。到1980年代初,出现了新的外部威胁:日本公司取代了信息技术行业的很大一部分。国家冠军并没有跟上步伐。威胁来自新的政策模型。从日本,世界各地的企业和政府那里汲取教训(现在已受到质疑),开始尝试采用协作方法进行创新。此外,尽管ESPRIT和EUREKA之类的欧洲内部合作促进政策虽然很少有证据表明它们有助于提高欧洲竞争力,但作为促进欧洲社会,政治和经济一体化的一种机制获得了实质性支持。通过三种理论方法设计欧洲合作研发政策。首先,研发市场失灵的模型解释了决策者如何将创新视为经济增长的中心,以及为什么他们寻求研发规模经济,风险分散和结果广泛传播。其次,嵌入式模型强调了持续的个人关系及其社会环境对创新和技术传播的重要性。它阐明了政策对企业获取和创造性地应用外部技术资源的能力的重视。第三,社会资本方法认为,政策在教授协作型社会机构方面与提供技术一样重要。他们的明确目标是使欧洲内部的技术共享行为规范,这是日常业务活动的一部分。在这方面,这些政策与建立欧洲联盟来促进的更深层次的欧洲一体化社会政治意识形态特别吻合。

著录项

  • 作者

    Watkins, Todd Allan.;

  • 作者单位

    Harvard University.;

  • 授予单位 Harvard University.;
  • 学科 Commerce-Business.;Public administration.;International law.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1995
  • 页码 405 p.
  • 总页数 405
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号