首页> 外文学位 >Indices of written language assessment in Taiwanese youth: Syntax and semantics.
【24h】

Indices of written language assessment in Taiwanese youth: Syntax and semantics.

机译:台湾青年的书面语言评估指标:语法和语义。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this study was to identify sensitive indices that can be used for written language assessment of Taiwanese youth in the areas of syntax and semantics. Four written prompts, two in the narrative mode and two in the expository mode, were utilized to elicit four written language samples per student. A scoring manual, developed by the investigator, was explicitly designed for scorers who were not linguists. Written language samples from 108 subjects (36 in each level of language achievement) were scored in both language domains, syntax, and semantics, based on 28 potential indices.;With respect to the semantic domain, results indicated that five factors used to measure vocabulary size (i.e., total characters, different words, mature characters, mature words, and corrected type token ratio) can best differentiate vocabulary maturity among the groups. The findings also provided evidence that using characters as a unit to measure the vocabulary size or sentence length has the same reliability as that measured by words. In addition, greater use of idioms in written texts appears to be characteristic of language proficiency during preadolescence.;This study offers an overview of written language assessment of preadolescents. However, much work is still needed to discover meaningful ways of measuring children's language production in the school-aged period and interpreting of the results of language sample analysis. It would be interesting to conduct a longitudinal study of students (follow the same students through preadolescence and adolescence) in order to gain a better understanding of what really is happening on an individual basis.;The results indicated there was not a significant difference in the total number of sentences written across the three levels; however, a significant difference was found in the number or proportion of the complexity of sentence structures used (i.e., Type I sentences: containing only one independent clause; Type V sentences: a sentence containing three or more clauses with at least one or more conjunctions to link them). Sentence length, measured either by characters or words, was found to be the best index to differentiate between the three groups regarding syntactic complexity of a written sample.
机译:本研究的目的是确定可用于语法和语义方面的台湾青年书面语言评估的敏感指标。四个书面提示,其中两个是叙事模式,两个是说明性模式,可用来吸引每个学生四个书面语言样本。由研究人员开发的评分手册是专门为非语言学家设计的。根据28个潜在指标对来自108个科目的写作语言样本(每个语言水平的36个科目)在语言领域,语法和语义上都进行了评分。关于语义领域,结果表明用于测量词汇量的五个因素大小(即,总字符数,不同单词,成熟字符,成熟单词和校正的类型标记比率)可以最好地区分组中的词汇成熟度。这些发现还提供了证据,证明以字符为单位来测量词汇量或句子长度与以单词为单位具有相同的可靠性。此外,在成语中更多地使用成语似乎是青春期前语言能力的特征。本研究概述了成年前的书面语言评估。但是,仍然需要进行大量工作来发现有意义的方法来衡量学龄儿童的语言能力并解释语言样本分析的结果。对学生进行纵向研究(在同一个学生之前经历青春期和青春期),以便更好地了解每个人的实际情况,将是一件很有趣的事;结果表明,在实际情况中两者之间没有显着差异。跨越三个级别的句子总数;但是,在使用的句子结构的复杂度的数量或比例方面存在显着差异(即,类型I句子:仅包含一个独立从句;类型V句子:包含三个或更多从句且具有至少一个或多个连词的句子链接它们)。句子长度(通过字符或单词来衡量)被认为是区分书面样本的句法复杂性的最佳指标。

著录项

  • 作者

    Huang, Rei-Jane.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Oregon.;

  • 授予单位 University of Oregon.;
  • 学科 Education Tests and Measurements.;Education Special.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1996
  • 页码 249 p.
  • 总页数 249
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号