首页> 外文学位 >Secondary school teachers' perspectives of teaching critical thinking in social studies classes in the Republic of China.
【24h】

Secondary school teachers' perspectives of teaching critical thinking in social studies classes in the Republic of China.

机译:民国时期中学教师在社会研究课中教授批判性思维的观点。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Teaching critical thinking has been emphasized in elementary and secondary schools for over 40 years in the United States. In contrast, it has not received much attention in Taiwanese education (Republic of China), until the last few years. This study examined secondary teachers' perspectives of teaching critical thinking in Taiwan. Eleven secondary-school social studies teachers were interviewed. All the interviews were audio taped. Data was later translated into English and analyzed qualitatively. Chinese was the primary language used during the processes of data collection. Whenever necessary, English was added for explanation.;Participants were asked their definition of critical thinking, whether they taught critical thinking or not, how they taught critical thinking skills, what difficulties they encountered when taught critical thinking, their views of current Taiwanese students' ability of critical thinking, and whether the Ministry of Education guidelines and Textbook Teacher's manuals provided enough information and assist for practical teaching of critical thinking.;Classroom observations were conducted and video taped. Notes were taken from the participating observation. Two trained researchers were invited to watch the video tapes and checked the translation. While watching the video tapes, three researchers worked on a sheet for identifying the teacher's teaching methods and rating to what extent the methods promoted students' critical thinking. All the data including audio and video tapes and written publications were sorted, grouped, and analyzed for identifying and seeking out patterns.;The design of the study also included material collection. The materials were books and journals mentioned by the teacher participants, the Ministry of Education guidelines (Senior High School Curriculum Criteria and Junior High School Curriculum Criteria), all students textbooks, Textbook Teacher's Manuals (Teacher's Brochure), and Chinese publications regarding teaching theories, strategies, methods, and materials of Social Studies.;The collected data were translated into English and analyzed qualitatively by the researcher. Two trained researchers with language proficiency in both Chinese and English were invited to check the translation for avoiding translation errors or semantic misunderstanding.;The result indicated that the social studies teachers were not familiar with critical thinking. Their definitions of critical thinking were considerably diverse, seven out of eleven teachers said that they did teach critical thinking skills. However, teachers in the study confirmed the finding of a previous study (Chiodo & Tsai, 1995) that students did not acquire critical thinking skills from Taiwanese schooling. Difficulties of teaching critical thinking related to students were mostly addressed. A considerable proportion of participants indicated that Taiwanese students had too much school work and with the added academic pressure for students to be successful in school they felt critical thinking teaching would be boring or not important, because it didn't increase student test score. Consequently, no response or reaction from students was the main difficulty in teaching critical thinking mentioned by teachers. The Ministry of education guidelines did not require teachers to teach critical thinking, neither did the Textbook Teacher's Manuals provide sufficient teaching strategies.
机译:在美国的中小学,强调批判性思维的教学已有40多年的历史了。相比之下,直到最近几年,它在台湾教育(中华民国)中并未受到太多关注。本研究考察了台湾中学教师对批判性思维教学的观点。采访了11名中学社会学教师。所有采访都录音。数据随后被翻译成英语并进行了定性分析。中文是数据收集过程中使用的主要语言。必要时,会添加英语进行解释。;要求参与者定义批判性思维,是否教批判性思维,如何教批判性思维技能,教给批判性思维时遇到什么困难,对当前台湾学生的看法批判性思维的能力,以及教育部指南和教科书教师手册是否提供了足够的信息,并有助于批判性思维的实践教学。课堂观察和录像带。记录来自参与观察。邀请两名训练有素的研究人员观看录像带并检查翻译。在观看录像带时,三名研究人员在一张纸上工作,以确定教师的教学方法,并评估这些方法在多大程度上促进了学生的批判性思维。包括录音带,录像带和书面出版物在内的所有数据都经过分类,分组和分析,以识别和寻找模式。研究设计还包括材料收集。这些材料包括教师参与者提到的书籍和期刊,教育部指南(高中课程标准和初中课程标准),所有学生教科书,教科书教师手册(教师手册)以及有关教学理论的中文出版物,研究的策略,方法和材料。收集的数据被翻译成英语,并由研究人员进行了定性分析。邀请两名训练有素的中,英文语言能力的研究人员来检查翻译,以避免翻译错误或语义误解。结果表明,社会学教师对批判性思维并不熟悉。他们对批判性思维的定义差别很大,每11名教师中就有7名说他们确实教过批判性思维技能。但是,该研究的教师证实了以前的一项研究发现(Chiodo&Tsai,1995),即学生没有从台湾学校学习批判性思维技巧。大多数与学生有关的批判性思维教学困难都得到解决。相当多的参与者表示,台湾学生的功课太多,而且学生在学业上取得成功的压力也越来越大,他们觉得批判性思维教学很无聊或不重要,因为这并没有增加学生的考试成绩。因此,在老师提到的批判性思维教学中,主要的困难是没有学生的反应。教育部的指导方针既没有要求教师教授批判性思维,《教科书教师手册》也没有提供足够的教学策略。

著录项

  • 作者

    Tsai, Min-Hsiu.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Oklahoma.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Oklahoma.;
  • 学科 Education Secondary.;Education Curriculum and Instruction.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1996
  • 页码 138 p.
  • 总页数 138
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号