首页> 外文学位 >Xenophon's view of Sparta: A study of the 'Anabasis,' 'Hellenica' and 'Respublica Lacedaemoniorum'.
【24h】

Xenophon's view of Sparta: A study of the 'Anabasis,' 'Hellenica' and 'Respublica Lacedaemoniorum'.

机译:色诺芬对斯巴达的看法:对“ Anabasis”,“ Hellenica”和“ Respublica Lacedaemoniorum”的研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This thesis has two primary aims: (1) to add weight to the minority opinion that Xenophon is not naively pro-Spartan and that while he appreciates and admires certain facets of the Spartan socio-political system, he recognises and criticises its inherent flaws, and (2) to show that Xenophon is consistent and even-handed in his treatment of Spartans throughout his works with no significant alteration over the period of his literary output. The focus is on those works in which Spartans figure most prominently: the Anabasis, Hellenica, and Respublica Lacedaemoniorum; the Agesilaus and Cyropaedia are dealt with insofar as they complement and illuminate matters under discussion.;The first two chapters show that very little is known with certainty about Xenophon's life and the chronology of the relevant works. I argue that this lack of factual evidence has opened the way for scholars to make inaccurate and misleading speculations in support of the traditional view that Xenophon is uncritically pro-Spartan. In the next two chapters various Spartan leaders in the Anabasis and Hellenica are examined with respect to the qualities which Xenophon believed a good leader should possess. It is concluded that Xenophon shows no obvious bias toward Spartans in either work; praise and criticism are apportioned as due. The fifth chapter considers the Respublica Lacedaemoniorum with emphasis on those aspects of the Spartan lifestyle which bear most directly on the way Spartan leaders function. The standard view of the work as encomiastic is challenged and its purpose is reassessed. I argue that Xenophon simply presents an analysis of those Spartan laws and institutions which he believed allowed Sparta to rise to pre-eminence in the Greek world. A comparison with what he says elsewhere shows that he did not necessarily consider these laws to be ideal or worthy of imitation. A short conclusion draws attention to the consistency in Xenophon's attitude to Sparta in the works considered.
机译:本论文有两个主要目的:(1)增强少数派观点,即色诺芬不是天真的支持斯巴达的人,他虽然赞赏并钦佩斯巴达社会政治体系的某些方面,但他承认并批评其固有的缺陷, (2)表明色诺芬在其整个作品中对斯巴达人的对待是一贯的,持平的,并且在其文学创作期间没有发生重大变化。重点放在斯巴达人最突出的那些作品上:Anabasi,Hellenica和Respublica Lacedaemoniorum;在讨论和补充讨论中的问题时,只讨论了阿格西劳斯和莎草科。前两章表明,对于色诺芬的生活和相关作品的年代安排,人们知之甚少。我认为,事实证据的缺乏为学者们提供了不准确和误导性的推测,以支持色诺芬不加批判地亲斯巴达的传统观点开辟了道路。在接下来的两章中,将对Xenophon认为一个好的领导者应具备的素质进行考察,以分析和分析Anabasis和Hellenica中的各个Spartan领导者。结论是,色诺芬在这两部作品中都没有对斯巴达人的明显偏见。称赞和批评应按比例分配。第五章介绍了Respublica Lacedaemoniorum,重点是斯巴达人生活方式中与斯巴达领导人的运作方式最直接相关的方面。对工作的一般观点提出了质疑,并重新评估了其目的。我认为Xenophon只是对斯巴达的法律和制度进行了分析,他认为这些法律和制度使斯巴达在希腊世界中获得了举足轻重的地位。与他在其他地方所说的相比较表明,他不一定认为这些定律是理想的或值得模仿的。一个简短的结论提请注意所考虑的作品中色诺芬对待斯巴达的态度的一致性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Humble, Noreen M.;

  • 作者单位

    McMaster University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 McMaster University (Canada).;
  • 学科 Literature Classical.;History Ancient.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1997
  • 页码 280 p.
  • 总页数 280
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号