首页> 外文学位 >American cultural politics and the rise of bioethics.
【24h】

American cultural politics and the rise of bioethics.

机译:美国的文化政治和生物伦理学的兴起。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

I examine American cultural politics during the 1960s and 70s through the emergence of "bioethics." During the 1960s, scientists, lawyers, philosophers, and theologians argued that a new rash of technologies was transforming the moral order. These "bioethicists" maintained that society was unprepared to answer the moral questions posed by these technologies and that, therefore, their services were needed.;My research suggests that bioethical impulses found their way into enduring social institutions not because they represented the social challenges of the 1960s but because they successfully diffused those challenges.;The modern roots of bioethics reach back to the post war "responsible science movement." Moreover, bioethics is part of the American tradition of ambivalence towards progress. The dissipation of this type of dissent has been one of the pillars of a technological society.;The bioethics "movement" assisted in transforming a social confrontation into a situation where experts managed problems generated by a technology which came to be seen, ironically, as value neutral in its creation even while it was problem-causing in its outcomes. I consider the place of bioethics within the larger narrative of 1960s protest culture and conclude that the movement from the 60s to the 70s is a shift from critique to management.;I report on the Hastings Center in New York, the nation's first bioethics institute. Additionally, I discuss how the impulse to redefine death surfaced when the demands of researchers for transplantable organs created a conflict of interest on the part of doctors deciding whether or not to "pull the plug" on potential organ donors who were irreversibly comatose. The unanticipated consequence of this situation led to the Quinlan "death with dignity" case in 1975. I describe the misconceptions surrounding the Quinlan controversy that fueled the growth of bioethics.;By the mid-1970s, bioethics was functioning as midwife to technologies and to a medical research community in need of broad social acceptance. The history of the cultural politics of bioethics exemplifies an important phenomenon in American history--the ebbing of the protest culture of the 1960s.
机译:通过“生物伦理学”的出现,我考察了1960年代和70年代的美国文化政治。在1960年代,科学家,律师,哲学家和神学家争辩说,新的技术浪潮正在改变道德秩序。这些“生物伦理主义者”坚持认为,社会没有准备好回答这些技术带来的道德问题,因此需要他们的服务。;我的研究表明,生物伦理冲动找到了进入持久社会机构的途径,并不是因为它们代表了社会挑战。 1960年代,但是因为它们成功地解决了这些挑战。生物伦理学的现代根源可以追溯到战后的“负责任的科学运动”。此外,生物伦理学是美国追求进步的矛盾传统的一部分。这种异议的消散一直是技术社会的支柱之一。;生物伦理学的“运动”帮助将社会对抗转变为专家处理技术产生的问题的情况,讽刺的是,这种情况被视为即使在创建过程中引起问题的时候,它在创建过程中仍然保持价值中立。我考虑了生物伦理学在1960年代较大规模的抗议文化中的地位,并得出结论认为,从60年代到70年代的运动是从批判向管理的转变。;我在纽约黑斯廷斯中心(Hastings Center)做报告,这是美国第一家生物伦理学研究所。另外,我讨论了当研究人员对可移植器官的需求引起医生之间的利益冲突时,重新定义死亡的冲动如何出现,医生决定是否“挽回”潜在不可逆转的器官供体。这种情况的出乎意料的后果导致了1975年奎兰(Quinlan)“尊严地死”案。我描述了围绕奎兰(Quinlan)争议的误解,助长了生物伦理学的发展。需要广泛社会认可的医学研究社区。生物伦理学的文化政治史是美国历史上的一个重要现象,即1960年代抗议文化的兴起。

著录项

  • 作者

    Stevens, Marian Louise.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Berkeley.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Berkeley.;
  • 学科 American Studies.;History United States.;Law.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1997
  • 页码 362 p.
  • 总页数 362
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号