首页> 外文学位 >Site characterization and foundation design in sands.
【24h】

Site characterization and foundation design in sands.

机译:沙子中的场地特征和地基设计。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A major concern in soil characterization is whether the soil is tested in its natural physical and chemical environment. In particular, where cohesionless soils are encountered, reliable soil characterization is difficult using conventional sampling and laboratory testing, due to unavoidable disturbance and difficulties associated with sampling. Consideration is therefore directed to alternative methods of in situ testing.; Much of the existing research work on sand is based on ideal uncemented low to medium compressible sand. Hence, engineering design based on these studies may not always be valid for all sands. A comprehensive procedure to identify and to evaluate 'unusual' sands has not yet been established. The effect of cementation on the strength-deformation behavior of sands is often ignored since cementation usually improves the shear strength. However, neglecting cementation can result in an overly conservative design of shallow and deep foundations as well as slopes and retaining walls. The stress history and age of the deposit are among the important factors which control the deformation characteristics of the soil. A reliable procedure for determining horizontal in situ stress has also not yet been established for cohesionless soils.; Few attempts have been made to estimate the ultimate bearing capacity of shallow footings directly from CPT data. The ultimate bearing capacity of shallow footings on sand is often overpredicted using correlations based on test results from calibration chamber tests performed on uncemented unaged sands while some natural sands are lightly cemented. Most of the methods for the prediction of settlement of footings on sand have been based on the conventional elastic formula. An equivalent soil modulus is frequently estimated based on in-situ testing measurements using empirical correlations.; The objective of this research has been to identify new ways to evaluate cohesionless soils, based on seismic techniques, such as the Seismic CPT. The research has focused on the identification of unusual sands, such as, highly compressible and/or cemented sands, and the quantification of their compressibility, stiffness, level of cementation, and in-situ stress and stress history. Relationships and methods have also been developed to evaluate the bearing capacity, and settlement of shallow footings on sand.
机译:土壤表征的主要问题是土壤是否在其自然物理和化学环境下进行测试。特别是在遇到无粘性土壤的情况下,由于不可避免的干扰和与采样相关的困难,使用常规采样和实验室测试难以可靠地表征土壤。因此,考虑了其他原位测试方法。现有的许多沙子研究工作都是基于理想的非胶结低至中度可压缩沙子。因此,基于这些研究的工程设计可能并不总是适用于所有沙子。尚未建立识别和评估“不寻常”沙粒的综合程序。胶结作用对砂土强度-变形行为的影响通常被忽略,因为胶结作用通常会提高剪切强度。但是,忽略胶结会导致浅层和深层基础以及斜坡和挡土墙的设计过于保守。应力历史和沉积物的年龄是控制土壤变形特征的重要因素之一。对于无粘性土,还没有建立确定水平原位应力的可靠方法。很少有尝试直接从CPT数据中估算浅层基础的极限承载力。沙地上浅层基础的极限承载力通常会根据相关性高估,这些相关性基于对未胶结的未时效砂岩进行的校准室测试得出的测试结果,而某些天然砂岩则是轻度胶结。预测地基在沙滩上沉降的大多数方法都基于常规弹性公式。通常使用经验相关性基于现场测试测量来估算等效土壤模量。这项研究的目的是基于地震技术(例如CPT),确定评估无粘性土的新方法。这项研究的重点是识别不寻常的沙子,例如高度可压缩和/或胶结的沙子,并对它们的可压缩性,刚度,胶结程度以及原地应力和应力历程进行量化。还开发了关系和方法来评估承载力和浅层基础在沙子上的沉降。

著录项

  • 作者

    Eslaamizaad, Soheil.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Alberta (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Alberta (Canada).;
  • 学科 Geotechnology.; Engineering Civil.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1997
  • 页码 224 p.
  • 总页数 224
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 地质学;建筑科学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号