首页> 外文学位 >Determinants of the choice of financial instruments: An empirical investigation.
【24h】

Determinants of the choice of financial instruments: An empirical investigation.

机译:金融工具选择的决定因素:一项实证研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this study is to empirically test hypotheses derived from theoretical models which attempt to explain optimal capital structure decisions. In particular, we investigate the effects of personal and corporate taxes, bankruptcy costs, information asymmetries, agency costs, and the product market structure on the type of financing employed by corporations. The quality of a firm, the slope of the yield curve, and industry concentration ratios are also included in the pool of independent variables. Binomial and multinomial PROBIT models are utilized to test the choice among straight debt, convertible debt, and common equity. The simultaneous determination of debt and taxes, and debt and total assets are also incorporated in the analysis. There is strong evidence that deviations from a long-run target debt ratio are extremely important in the type of financing chosen. The U-shaped relationship between risk and leverage is also confirmed. Moreover, we obtain a negative and statistically significant coefficient for risk when the long-run measure of risk is utilized. All the other results are highly dependent on the approximation used for the probability of bankruptcy. There is evidence, albeit a weak one, that increases in the difference between personal and corporate tax rates augment the use of leverage. High levels of depreciation and investment tax credits increase the probability of a non-equity issue. Corporations with high growth opportunities and high percentage of insider ownership do use equity when external financing is needed. The quality of a corporation is insignificant in determining the type of financing. The results on the effect of the slope of the yield curve and industry concentration are mixed. Overall, the results support the static tax and bankruptcy tradeoff models as well as the agency costs models.
机译:本研究的目的是对来自理论模型的假设进行经验检验,这些理论试图解释最优的资本结构决策。特别是,我们调查了个人和公司税,破产成本,信息不对称,代理成本以及产品市场结构对公司所采用的融资类型的影响。公司的质量,收益率曲线的斜率和行业集中度也包括在自变量池中。利用二项式和多项式PROBIT模型来测试直接债务,可转换债务和普通股之间的选择。分析中还同时确定了债务和税收以及债务和总资产。有充分的证据表明,在选择的融资类型中,偏离长期目标债务比率非常重要。风险和杠杆之间的U型关系也得到了证实。此外,当使用风险的长期度量时,我们获得的风险系数为负数且具有统计意义。所有其他结果都高度依赖于破产概率所使用的近似值。有证据表明,尽管个人和公司税率之间的差异增加,但杠杆作用的使用却微弱。高水平的折旧和投资税收抵免增加了出现非股权问题的可能性。具有高增长机会和高内部人所有权比例的公司在需要外部融资时确实会使用股权。公司的质量在确定融资类型方面微不足道。收益率曲线的斜率和行业集中度的影响结果混合在一起。总体而言,结果支持静态税收和破产权衡模型以及代理成本模型。

著录项

  • 作者

    Mariola, Eleni.;

  • 作者单位

    Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - Newark.;

  • 授予单位 Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - Newark.;
  • 学科 Economics Finance.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1997
  • 页码 250 p.
  • 总页数 250
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 财政、金融;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号