首页> 外文学位 >Economic analysis of farmland protection policies in Ontario.
【24h】

Economic analysis of farmland protection policies in Ontario.

机译:安大略省农田保护政策的经济分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The main objective of this study was to assess the economic rationale of farmland protection policies in Ontario.;The property rights literature was reviewed to discuss the externality rationale of government regulation of farmland development. The findings are that properly defined property rights along with nuisance and trespass laws, can be used as an alternative to land use regulation in the allocation of land, and thus argues against the externality rationale of farmland protection policies.;An analysis of farmland area, cropland area and food production in Ontario was undertaken to assess the food security rationale of farmland preservation. The results indicate that food production in Ontario has consistently increased over time. Conversion of farmland to non-farm uses is therefore not a major threat to food production at the present time.;An economic model was developed to determine the optimal land allocation. A farmland rental demand function was also estimated. The result indicates that the demand for farmland has an elasticity of ;Sensitivity analysis indicated that shadow values of farmland protection policies are larger the higher the price ratio of non-farmland to farmland and the more elastic the non-farmland demand elasticity.;A comparison of the shadow values of this study with estimated willingness to pay for amenity benefits associated with farmland indicates that the shadow values of farmland protection policies are greater than the willingness to pay for amenity benefits. However, the shadow values estimated in this study are gross values and do not take into account all external benefits and costs associated with farmland and non-farmland. Furthermore, future benefits and costs of alternative land uses are not known. Estimation of these benefits and costs are beyond the scope of this study. It cannot therefore be concluded on the basis of the shadow values, that current farmland policies are unjustified. The conclusion on the justification of farmland protection policies can only be made after including all benefits and costs and weighing these shadow values to the discounted future benefits of farmland protection policies.
机译:本研究的主要目的是评估安大略省耕地保护政策的经济原理。审查了产权文献,讨论了政府对耕地发展进行监管的外部性理论。研究结果是,正确定义的产权以及令人讨厌的法律和侵入法,可以用作土地分配中土地使用监管的替代方法,从而与农田保护政策的外部性理由背道而驰。安大略省进行了农田面积和粮食生产,以评估农田保护的粮食安全依据。结果表明,安大略省的粮食产量一直随着时间增长。因此,目前农田转化为非农业用途并不是对粮食生产的主要威胁。;建立了一种经济模型来确定最佳土地分配。还估算了农田租金需求函数。结果表明,耕地需求具有弹性;敏感性分析表明,非耕地与耕地的价格比越高,耕地保护政策的影子值越大,非耕地需求弹性越有弹性。这项研究的影子值加上估计的与农田相关的支付福利的意愿表明,农田保护政策的影子值大于支付的福利的意愿。但是,本研究中估计的影子值是总值,并未考虑与耕地和非耕地相关的所有外部收益和成本。此外,还不知道替代土地用途的未来收益和成本。这些收益和成本的估算超出了本研究的范围。因此,不能根据影子值得出结论,认为当前的耕地政策是不合理的。关于耕地保护政策合理性的结论只有在将所有收益和成本包括在内并权衡这些影子价值与耕地保护政策的未来折现收益后才能得出。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    University of Guelph (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Guelph (Canada).;
  • 学科 Agricultural economics.;Agriculture.;Public administration.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1997
  • 页码 278 p.
  • 总页数 278
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号