首页> 外文学位 >Shakespeare's 'King Lear' with 'The Tempest': The discovery of nature and the Shakespearean recovery of classical natural right.
【24h】

Shakespeare's 'King Lear' with 'The Tempest': The discovery of nature and the Shakespearean recovery of classical natural right.

机译:莎士比亚的“里尔王”与“暴风雨”:自然的发现与莎士比亚对古典自然权利的恢复。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation is an inquiry into the political thought or philosophy of Shakespeare, through a reading of King Lear with The Tempest. Drawing on the work of many readers, it is an attempt to carefully consider and comment on King Lear, beginning from the argument that in Lear, Shakespeare centrally considers the uncovering of nature and recovery of philosophy as this occurred in the Renaissance. What happens to Lear and to his kingdom resembles that which occurs in the ruling opinion of the West, and to this kingdom. In the central scene of the central act, the king sees what he calls "unaccommodated man," in the appearance of Edgar disguised as mad, near naked beggar. Lear identifies this divested man with the "thing itself" of man, calling him "philosopher." But Lear sees only the appearance of the disguise of Edgar. In his madness, Lear comes to believe that there is no justice or filial ethics, but that all the human things are artificial additions to a nearly animal nature. The reconciliation of Lear to Cordelia is a reconciliation to the higher, specifically human nature, or to the divine in man.;In light of The Tempest, the character of Edgar appears as analogous to the philosopher. The opposition between the two brothers Edgar and Edmund reflects two fundamental philosophic appeals from custom to nature. In his first soliloquy, Edmund, like Machiavelli, appeals from conventional legitimacy to the fierce acquisitive nature which disregards justice in the pursuit of worldly goods or power. By contrast, Edgar is the example of virtue or the royal nature. In the characters of Edgar and Cordelia, Shakespeare points toward a recovery of natural right in the circumstances of modernity. This response to the principles of the animal and the tyrannic natures indicates a Shakespearean recovery of Socratic political philosophy. This recovery might save the West as Edgar saves Britain from the tyranny of Edmund.
机译:本文通过对《李尔王》和《暴风雨》的阅读来探讨莎士比亚的政治思想或哲学。借鉴许多读者的作品,这是一种尝试仔细地对李尔王进行评论和评论的尝试,从这样的论点开始:莎士比亚在李尔中集中考虑文艺复兴时期自然的发现和哲学的复兴。里尔及其王国发生的事情类似于西方和该王国统治时期发生的事情。在中央行为的中央场景中,国王在裸露的乞g附近伪装成疯子的埃德加(Edgar)出现时,看到了他所谓的“不随和的人”。李尔(Lear)用这个人的“事物本身”来识别这个被剥离的人,称他为“哲学家”。但是李尔只看到了埃德加的伪装。里尔疯狂地相信没有正义或孝顺的道德准则,但所有人类事物都是近乎动物性的人为补充。李尔和科尔迪利亚的和解是对更高的,特别是人的本性或对人的神圣的和解。根据《暴风雨》,埃德加的性格与哲学家相似。埃德加(Edgar)和埃德蒙(Edmund)两兄弟之间的对立反映了从习俗到自然的两种基本哲学诉求。像马基雅维利(Machiavelli)一样,埃德蒙(Edmund)在他的第一个独白中就从传统的合法性向凶猛的收购性诉求,这种追求性在追求世俗商品或权力时无视正义。相比之下,埃德加是美德或皇家性质的典范。莎士比亚以埃德加(Edgar)和科迪莉亚(Cordelia)的角色指出,在现代性的情况下自然权利的恢复。这种对动物原理和暴虐性质的反应表明莎士比亚复兴了苏格拉底政治哲学。这种复苏可能会拯救西方,就像埃德加(Edgar)将英国从埃德蒙(Edmund)的暴政中拯救出来一样。

著录项

  • 作者

    McDonald, Mark Allen.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Dallas.;

  • 授予单位 University of Dallas.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.;Political Science General.;Literature English.;Theater.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1997
  • 页码 472 p.
  • 总页数 472
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号