首页> 外文学位 >Histories of realism: Stifter, Storm, and Meyer in the age of Ranke.
【24h】

Histories of realism: Stifter, Storm, and Meyer in the age of Ranke.

机译:现实主义的历史:兰奇时代的史蒂夫特,斯托姆和迈尔。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The dissertation examines reciprocal relations between two forms of historical discourse that emerged simultaneously in the nineteenth century: realist historical fiction and the academic discourse of objective history. Concentrating on historiographical texts by Leopold von Ranke, as well as on historical novellas by Adalbert Stifter, Theodor Storm, and Conrad Ferdinand Meyer, the study investigates realism's response to the increasing professionalization of the discipline of history in the nineteenth century.; With the advent of modern Geschichtswissenschaft came a narrow, state-oriented definition of the historian's appropriate subject matter. How does Ranke's limited conception of what merits historical representation drive other, more inclusive forms of historical writing out of the academic setting and into the literary domain? I argue that historical fiction played a crucial role in broadening historical discourse in the nineteenth century, often broaching practical and theoretical concerns scarcely admissible in ninteenth-century academic institutions. Realism's historiographic metafictions self-consciously reflect on the epistemological aporias of objective history, the status and selection of historical evidence, the definition of the historically significant, and the ideological uses and abuses of history.; Chapter one examines Ranke's model of objective history and its relationship to realist discourse. The second chapter approaches Stifter's Die Narrenburg (1841) as an early intervention in discussions of historical mimesis and as an attempt to negotiate a discursive role in the historical domain for those individuals and groups excluded by academic historians. Two of Storm's Chroniknovellen, Renate (1878) and Zur Chronik von Gieshuus (1884) are analysed in chapter three: Storm stages the acts of historical representation and reception in order to expose the ideologically mediated quality of historical documentation and undermine the type of monologic master narrative advocated by historians such as Ranke. The final chapter argues that Meyer's Das Leiden eines Knaben (1883) and Der Heilige (1879) deliberately foreground and critique the role played by social dynamics of race, class, and gender in the scripting of history. The study aims to demonstrate realism's involvement with issues concerning the politics of historical representation that continue to trouble our twentieth-century historical consciousness.
机译:本文考察了在19世纪同时出现的两种历史话语形式之间的相互关系:现实主义历史小说和客观历史学话语。研究集中于利奥波德·冯·兰克的史学文本,以及阿达尔伯特·史蒂夫特,西奥多·斯托姆和康拉德·费迪南德·梅耶的历史小说,该研究调查了现实主义对十九世纪历史学科专业化的反应。随着现代《 Geschichtswissenschaft》的出现,对历史学家的适当主题进行了狭窄的,面向国家的定义。兰克对历史表现的重要性的有限观念是如何将其他更具包容性的历史写作形式从学术环境带入文学领域的?我认为,历史小说在扩大19世纪的历史话语中起着至关重要的作用,经常提出在19世纪学术机构中几乎不容许的实践和理论问题。现实主义的史学元小说会自觉地反思客观历史的认识论上的谬论,历史证据的地位和选择,历史意义的定义以及历史的意识形态使用和滥用。第一章探讨了兰克的客观历史模型及其与现实主义话语的关系。第二章探讨了史蒂夫特的《纳伦堡之死》(1841),作为对历史模仿的讨论的早期干预,并试图为学术史学家所排除的个人和团体在历史领域中发挥话语作用。第三章分析了斯托姆的《史克尼诺夫连》(Renate,1878年)和祖尔•克罗尼克·冯·吉休斯(Zur Chronik von Gieshuus,1884年)中的两个:风暴分阶段进行历史表示和接受的行为,以揭示意识形态介导的历史文献的质量并破坏单一论者的类型历史学家,例如兰克(Ranke)提倡的叙事。最后一章认为,梅耶的《达斯·莱顿·恩尼斯·纳本》(1883年)和德·海利格(1879年)刻意地强调并批评了种族,阶级和性别的社会动力在历史脚本中所扮演的角色。这项研究旨在证明现实主义与历史代表政治有关的问题继续困扰着我们二十世纪的历史意识。

著录项

  • 作者

    Reidy, Ann Elizabeth.;

  • 作者单位

    Harvard University.;

  • 授予单位 Harvard University.;
  • 学科 Literature Germanic.; History European.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1997
  • 页码 243 p.
  • 总页数 243
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 欧洲史;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号