首页> 外文学位 >A systematic approach to evaluate quantitative impacts of project management (PM).
【24h】

A systematic approach to evaluate quantitative impacts of project management (PM).

机译:一种评估项目管理(PM)定量影响的系统方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study presents a methodology to systematically assess the Project Management Process Maturity (PM){dollar}sp2{dollar} of an organization. This assessment can be used to measure and compare quantitatively the Project Management (PM) effectiveness of organizations.; A 5-level (PM){dollar}sp2{dollar} Model and 3-part (PM){dollar}sp2{dollar} Assessment Questionnaire are introduced to position and determine an organization's current and relative PM level. The (PM){dollar}sp2{dollar} Assessment Methodology is shown to be an effective tool for measuring an organization's PM level.; A total of 38 organizations, including 15 Engineering and Construction (EC), 10 Information Management and Movement (IMM, a.k.a. telecommunications), 10 Information Systems (IS, a.k.a. software development), and 3 Hi-Tech Manufacturing (HTM) companies, participated in the study.; The assessment results show that organizations have actively applied PM practices for an average of 10.7 years. It also reveals that the average organization spends 6% of project value on total PM costs. A 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) scale is used to measure and compare the relative PM level. The overall Project Management Process Maturity of the IS industry lags substantially behind the other industries. The EC (3.36), HTM (3.34), and IMM (3.30) industries are relatively mature yet even they have substantial room for PM processes improvement.; This study also develops a methodology to estimate the financial return on PM investment (PM/ROI) on an order-of-magnitude basis. First, regression analysis reveals that the organizational PM level and actual cost and schedule performance data from projects representative of the companies are positively associated. The PM/ROI calculation procedure is then presented to encourage managers to pursue investing in PM, as well as these PM processes, in very specific and useful ways.; The major contribution of this research is to provide a solid and comparative analysis methodology on PM practices across industries and companies which in turn can help managers to improve their PM processes and effectiveness.
机译:这项研究提出了一种系统地评估组织的项目管理过程成熟度(PM){dol}} sp2 {dollar}的方法。该评估可用于度量和定量比较组织的项目管理(PM)有效性。引入了5级(PM){sp2} {dollar}模型和3级(PM){sp2} sp2 {dollar}评估问卷,以定位和确定组织当前和相对的PM级别。 (PM){dollar} sp2 {dollar}评估方法论是衡量组织PM级别的有效工具。共有38个组织参加,其中包括15个工程和建设(EC),10个信息管理和运动(IMM,又名电信),10个信息系统(IS,又名软件开发)和3个高科技制造(HTM)公司。在研究中。评估结果表明,组织平均已积极应用PM实践10.7年。它还表明,普通组织将项目价值的6%用于项目管理总成本。 1(最低)至5(最高)标度用于测量和比较相对PM水平。 IS行业的整体项目管理流程成熟度大大落后于其他行业。 EC(3.36),HTM(3.34)和IMM(3.30)行业虽然相对成熟,但它们仍有改善PM工艺的空间。这项研究还开发了一种方法,可以按数量级估算PM投资的财务回报(PM / ROI)。首先,回归分析显示组织的PM水平与代表公司的项目的实际成本和进度绩效数据呈正相关。然后提出了PM / ROI的计算程序,以鼓励管理者以非常具体和有用的方式进行PM和这些PM流程的投资。这项研究的主要贡献是,为跨行业和公司的PM实施提供了可靠的比较分析方法,进而可以帮助管理人员改善其PM流程和有效性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kwak, Young Hoon.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Berkeley.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Berkeley.;
  • 学科 Operations Research.; Business Administration Management.; Engineering Industrial.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1997
  • 页码 149 p.
  • 总页数 149
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 运筹学;贸易经济;一般工业技术;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号