首页> 外文学位 >Development of a method for determining the relative manufacturing complexity of advanced engineering materials.
【24h】

Development of a method for determining the relative manufacturing complexity of advanced engineering materials.

机译:确定高级工程材料的相对制造复杂性的方法的开发。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The immediate adaptation of newly developed materials--with unique and highly desirable properties--is hampered by several factors, including: (1) high material cost and limited availability, (2) lack of information on them, including prior experience in their design and manufacture, immature manufacturing processes and general uncertainty in their behavior patterns, (3) unique handling issues, such as excessive manual labor, high process temperatures, toxicity, disposal problems, limited working lives, and low damage tolerance; Therefore, in spite of their significant benefits, potential users tend to shy away from the widespread use of new materials, instead preferring conventional and tested materials forms.; This dissertation is on a methodology developed to compare manufacturing complexity of new materials with that of conventional ones. It entails development of a 5 level multi-attribute hierarchy of 18 factors and several processes that influence the manufacturing risk of new materials. A Manufacturing Complexity Factor (MCF) and a Delta Complexity Factor (DCF) are developed to compare new materials with older, traditional ones. The Analytic Hierarchy Process is used to judiciously assign weights to all factors and sub-factors.; Materials are assigned "ranks" based on information available about their unique properties and requirements. From the rank and attribute priorities, values for MCF/DCF can be obtained. Since information available is often limited, the ranks assigned to materials are not highly accurate values. The Monte Carlo simulation technique is used to take away some of the uncertainty in the ranks of the newly developed materials and generate a more "robust" MCF/DCF value.; Sensitivity of the method to varying inputs is examined. An attempt is made to compare this practical methodology with two popular approaches, one used for analyzing the complexity of composite materials and another that develops manufacturing complexity factors for given input parameters. It is shown that the methodology in this dissertation generates results not possible by either of the other two methods.
机译:新开发的材料具有独特且令人非常满意的特性,其立即适应性受到以下几个因素的阻碍,这些因素包括:(1)材料成本高且可用性有限,(2)缺乏有关它们的信息,包括其设计的先前经验(3)独特的处理问题,例如过度的体力劳动,高的处理温度,毒性,处置问题,有限的工作寿命和低的损害承受能力;因此,尽管潜在的好处很大,但潜在的用户还是倾向于避开新材料的广泛使用,而倾向于使用传统的和经过测试的材料形式。本论文的研究方法是将新材料与传统材料的制造复杂度进行比较。它需要开发一个由18个因素组成的5级多属性层次结构,以及几个会影响新材料制造风险的过程。开发了制造复杂度因子(MCF)和增量复杂度因子(DCF)来将新材料与较旧的传统材料进行比较。层次分析法用于明智地为所有因子和子因子分配权重。根据有关材料的独特属性和要求的可用信息,为它们分配“等级”。从等级和属性优先级,可以获得MCF / DCF的值。由于可用信息通常很有限,因此分配给物料的等级不是高度准确的值。蒙特卡罗模拟技术用于消除新开发材料等级中的某些不确定性,并产生更“稳健”的MCF / DCF值。检查了该方法对各种输入的敏感性。试图将该实用方法与两种流行的方法进行比较,一种用于分析复合材料的复杂性,另一种针对给定的输入参数开发制造复杂性因子。结果表明,本文所采用的方法无法通过其他两种方法产生结果。

著录项

  • 作者

    Pandya, Shardul Yogendra.;

  • 作者单位

    Old Dominion University.;

  • 授予单位 Old Dominion University.;
  • 学科 Engineering Industrial.; Engineering System Science.; Engineering Materials Science.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1997
  • 页码 189 p.
  • 总页数 189
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 一般工业技术;系统科学;工程材料学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:48:51

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号