首页> 外文学位 >Science in historical perspectives: A content analysis of the history of science in secondary school physics textbooks.
【24h】

Science in historical perspectives: A content analysis of the history of science in secondary school physics textbooks.

机译:历史观点中的科学:中学物理教科书中科学史的内容分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The history of science was included in the first nationwide content standards document for K--12 school science, Benchmarks for Science Literacy (AAAS, 1993). Other national standards in science education, including the National Science Education Standards also state that students should know the history of science (NRC, 1996).;This study was intended to investigate both the extent and manner in which the history of science is included in current secondary school physics textbooks. Four secondary school physics textbooks were analyzed in this study. Three research tools were produced during the process of analysis: (a) a History of Science Unit Code Book, (b) a History of Science Conceptual Framework, (c) a History of Science Analytic Rubric for Textbooks.;The findings of this study are: First, the foci of the history of science passages (HOS Units) included in the textbooks were found to be aligned with the foci of the standards documents. Standards descriptions were found to emphasize students' mastery of scientific concepts. A significant number of HOS units focused on developing Conceptual Understanding. Second, the Conceptual Understanding in science required "depth" rather than "breadth." Most history of science examples in the textbooks were superficial and lacked in-depth elaboration. Third, the textbooks examples concerning the Procedural of Science (the process of thinking, investigation, and application) made little use of the historical approach to science education. Fourth, the history of science depicted by the standards documents is an ideal tool for helping students recognize their cultural heritage. However, limiting the content of history of science to a western view of science is insufficient to meet the goal of global science education.;The chief implication of this study is: Current science textbooks need major "surgery" to keep only the essential content for effective science instruction and learning. The reconstruction of science textbooks needs to be guided by clear vision of science literacy. The history of science shall be used to present the science, society, and technology in an integrated fashion for effective learning and understanding.
机译:科学史被包含在第一个针对K--12学校科学的全国性内容标准文档中,即《科学素养基准》(AAAS,1993年)。其他国家科学教育标准,包括《国家科学教育标准》也规定学生应了解科学史(NRC,1996)。本研究旨在研究将科学史纳入科学的程度和方式。目前的中学物理教科书。本研究分析了四本中学物理教科书。分析过程中产生了三种研究工具:(a)科学史单位密码本,(b)科学史概念框架的历史,(c)科学史分析教科书的历史;本研究的结果是:首先,发现教科书中所包含的科学段落的历史重点(HOS单位)与标准文件的重点一致。发现标准说明强调学生对科学概念的掌握。居者有其屋单位大量致力于发展概念理解。第二,科学中的概念理解需要“深度”而不是“宽度”。教科书中的大多数科学示例历史都是肤浅的,缺乏深入的阐述。第三,教科书中有关科学程序(思维,研究和应用过程)的例子很少使用历史方法进行科学教育。第四,标准文件描述的科学史是帮助学生认识其文化遗产的理想工具。但是,将科学史的内容限制在西方科学观之上,不足以满足全球科学教育的目标。该研究的主要含义是:当前的科学教科书需要重大的“外科手术”以仅保留基本的内容。有效的科学指导和学习。科学教科书的重建需要以科学素养的清晰视野为指导。科学史应以综合方式呈现科学,社会和技术,以进行有效的学习和理解。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wang, HsingChi.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Southern California.;

  • 授予单位 University of Southern California.;
  • 学科 Science education.;Science history.;Curriculum development.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1998
  • 页码 190 p.
  • 总页数 190
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:48:50

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号