首页> 外文学位 >Texture and color: Ethnic difference in the Enlightenment.
【24h】

Texture and color: Ethnic difference in the Enlightenment.

机译:纹理和颜色:启蒙运动中的种族差异。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study examines a foundational moment of modern "ethnicity." I frame my discussion around two concepts: "texture," which refers to eighteenth-century efforts to integrate ethnic differences into an Enlightenment notion of universalism, and "color" referring to differences perceived as irreducible.; My introduction analyzes Gearg Friedrich Wilhelm Hegel's Vorlesungen uber die Philosophie der Geschichte. Whereas Hegel links China by its texture to European Enlightenment discourse, he sees Africa as threat based on color. By insisting on these disparities, I propose a Foucaultian model of discourse analysis to account for the heterogeneity in constructions of ethnic difference, while unveiling that the configuration Self and Other has limited the thinking of ethnicity since Hegel.; Chapter one discusses universalism, beginning with Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz's establishment of Chinese philosophy (Zwei Briefe) as the basis for rationality. Leibniz conceives ethnic difference as but one appearance of infinite differences that express nothing but unlimited possibilities of reading the "world."; Chapter two centers around pedagogical tracts published anonymously in Journal von Tiefurt. Representations of ethnic difference serve as the medium through which constraints are inflicted upon individuals--with the effect that the acceptance of limitations becomes a universal norm.; Chapter three discusses travel literature, introducing the second geographical local, Africa. The distinctions between China and Africa may be described in perceptual rather than geographical terms. China continues to serve as a thread of universal texture, expressing now universal Woman. Africa, by contrast, represents effects ascribed to black skin.; Chapter four juxtaposes a tract on anatomy (Johann Peter Camper's "Uber den Ursprung der Farbe der Schwarzen") with a drama (Friedrich Schiller's Verschworung des Fiesko zu Genua). It explores eighteenth-century perceptions of skin color as a threat to individual and community, and the alliance of medical and aesthetic writings in disseminating such ideas. The chapter suggests how an aesthetic foundation of race was "invented" to cope with these threats.; Although "ethnicity" embraces the idea of ethnic difference as the expression of a universal language (texture), discourse analysis reveals the ruptures in universalism, once it confronts the body of the individual (color).
机译:这项研究考察了现代“民族”的基本时刻。我的讨论围绕两个概念展开:“纹理”,它指的是18世纪将种族差异纳入普世主义的启蒙概念的努力;“颜色”是指被认为是不可还原的差异。我的导言分析了Gearg Friedrich Wilhelm Hegel的《哲学史》。黑格尔将中国的质地与欧洲启蒙运动的话语联系起来,但他认为非洲是基于色彩的威胁。通过坚持这些差异,我提出了一个福柯式的话语分析模型,以解释种族差异建构中的异质性,同时揭示自黑格尔以来,“自我”和“他者”的配置限制了种族思想。第一章讨论普遍主义,首先从戈特弗里德·威廉·莱布尼兹(Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz)建立中国哲学(Zwei Briefe)作为合理性基础开始。莱布尼兹将种族差异视为一种无限差异的表象,这种差异仅表达了阅读“世界”的无限可能性。第二章围绕在《冯·蒂福特杂志》上匿名发表的教育领域。种族差异的体现是对个人施加限制的媒介,其结果是接受限制成为普遍规范。第三章讨论旅行文学,介绍第二个地理地区非洲。中非之间的区别可以用感性而非地理术语来描述。中国继续充当普遍纹理的线,现在表达普遍妇女。相比之下,非洲代表归因于黑色皮肤的影响。第四章将一段解剖学并置在一起(约翰·彼得·坎伯(Johann Peter Camper)的《 Uber den Ursprung der Farbe der Schwarzen》和一部戏剧(弗里德里希·席勒的《 Verschworung des Fiesko zu Genua》)。它探索了18世纪对肤色的感知,认为肤色对个人和社区构成威胁,并探讨了医学和美学著作在传播此类观念方面的联盟。本章提出如何“发明”种族的美学基础来应对这些威胁。尽管“民族性”将种族差异作为一种通用语言(纹理)的表达,但话语分析揭示了普遍主义一旦与个体的身体(颜色)对立时的破裂。

著录项

  • 作者

    Tautz, Birgit Gudrun.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Minnesota.;

  • 授予单位 University of Minnesota.;
  • 学科 Literature Germanic.; Literature Comparative.; Philosophy.; Sociology Ethnic and Racial Studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1998
  • 页码 262 p.
  • 总页数 262
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 文学理论;哲学理论;民族学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号