首页> 外文学位 >Testing, assessment, and evaluation in language programs.
【24h】

Testing, assessment, and evaluation in language programs.

机译:语言程序中的测试,评估和评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This three-article dissertation addresses three different yet interrelated topics: language testing, assessment, and evaluation. The first article (Saudi Student Placement into ESL Program Levels: Issues beyond Test Criteria) addresses a crucial yet understudied issue concerning why lower-level ESL classes typically contain a disproportionate number of Saudi students. Based on data obtained from different stakeholders, the findings revealed that one-third of the study students intentionally underperformed on ESL placement tests. However, ESL administrators participating in this study provided contradicting findings.;The second article explores the efficacy of (Integrating Self-assessment Techniques into L2 Classroom Assessment Procedures) by examining the accuracy of CEFR self-assessment rubric compared to students' TOEFL scores, and the extent to which gender and levels of language proficiency cause any potential score underestimation. By obtaining data from 21 ESL students attending the Center for English as a Second Language at University of Arizona, the findings revealed no statistically significant correlations between participants' self-assessed scores and their TOEFL scores. However, the participants reported that the CEFR self-assessment rubric is accurate in measuring their levels of language proficiency.;On the other hand, the third article (Quality Assurance and Accreditation as Forms for Language Program Evaluation: A Case Study of Two EFL Departments in A Saudi University) provides a simulated program evaluation based on an integrated set of standards of the NCAAA (the National Commission for Academic Accreditation and Assessment) and CEA (the Commission on English Language Program Accreditation). The findings indicated that the standards of the mission, curriculum, student learning outcomes, and program development, planning, and review, were partially met, whereas the standards of teaching strategies, assessment methods, and student achievement were not.
机译:这三篇论文论述了三个不同但相互关联的主题:语言测试,评估和评估。第一篇文章(沙特学生进入ESL程序级别:考试标准以外的问题)解决了一个至关重要但尚未得到充分研究的问题,即为什么较低级别的ESL班级通常包含不成比例的沙特学生。根据从不同利益相关者处获得的数据,研究结果表明,三分之一的研究学生在ESL入学测试中故意表现不佳。但是,参与该研究的ESL管理员提供了相互矛盾的结果。;第二篇文章通过检查CEFR自我评估规则与学生TOEFL得分的准确性,探讨了(将自我评估技术整合到L2课堂评估程序中)的功效。性别和语言水平导致任何潜在分数低估的程度。通过从参加亚利桑那大学英语作为第二语言中心的21名ESL学生中获取数据,研究结果表明,参与者的自我评估分数与他们的TOEFL分数之间没有统计学上的显着相关性。但是,参与者报告说,CEFR自我评估指标可以准确地衡量他们的语言水平。另一方面,第三篇文章(质量保证和认证为语言课程评估的形式:两个EFL部门的案例研究)一家沙特大学的学生)根据NCAAA(国家学术认证和评估委员会)和CEA(英语课程认证委员会)的一套综合标准,提供了模拟课程评估。调查结果表明,任务,课程,学生学习成果以及计划制定,计划和审查的标准得到部分满足,而教学策略,评估方法和学生成绩没有达到标准。

著录项

  • 作者

    Alobaid, Adnan.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Arizona.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Arizona.;
  • 学科 Linguistics.;English as a second language.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 207 p.
  • 总页数 207
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号