首页> 外文学位 >The form of the firm: A critical and normative theory of the corporation.
【24h】

The form of the firm: A critical and normative theory of the corporation.

机译:公司形式:公司的批判性规范理论。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation explores the corporation from the perspective of normative political theory. As I argue, the corporation is not easily located within the theoretical matrix of liberal democracy. Because of this, a political theory of the corporation is required in order to evaluate whether our corporate institutions are consonant with the liberal democratic values we affirm. The first half of the dissertation explores the Chicago School's political theory of the corporation. In this view corporations are taken to be the result of market-like individual voluntary initiatives, and therefore should be left alone for the sake of efficiency and liberty. The Chicago School argues for this, however, at the expense of coherence and sociological rigor. The better way to approach the corporation, I argue, is by seeing it as enabling what I call "norm-governed production." On my account, firms overcome market inefficiencies by drawing on social and cooperative scripts that allow for cooperative activity that the market under-produces or does not produce at all.;This analysis opens up an avenue for prescription and critique that does not deny the economic aspects of the corporation; if we admit that the efficiencies produced by the corporation entail normative scripts, and not merely voluntary contracts, then we can ask whether or not such scripts are compatible with our notions of fairness and justice. We can also ask whether changing scripts in the direction of fair or just relationships can be done without sacrificing too much in the way of corporate efficiency. In the second half of my dissertation I leverage this account of corporate efficiency into an alternative political theory of the corporation. I argue that our legal and political institutions ought to be restricted so as to protect corporations' vulnerable parties and to encourage ownership patterns that empower those who make the most personal investments. I further argue that, from the perspective of business ethics, the corporation ought to be reconceived as an agent in maximizing efficiency while also being an agent for mitigating social injustice.
机译:本文从规范政治理论的角度探讨了公司。正如我所说,公司不容易位于自由民主的理论矩阵之内。因此,需要一种公司的政治理论来评估我们的公司机构是否与我们所确认的自由民主价值观相吻合。论文的前半部分探讨了芝加哥学派的公司政治理论。在这种观点下,公司被认为是像市场一样的个人自愿性倡议的产物,因此,为了效率和自由,应当将公司单独放置。芝加哥学派为此辩护,但要牺牲连贯性和严格的社会学意义。我认为,与公司打交道的更好方法是将其视为可以实现所谓的“规范生产”。就我个人而言,公司通过利用社会和合作脚本克服市场效率低下的问题,这些脚本允许进行市场生产不足或根本不生产的合作活动;该分析为不否认经济的处方和批评开辟了道路公司方面;如果我们承认公司产生的效率需要规范性的脚本,而不仅仅是自愿合同,那么我们可以问这样的脚本是否与我们的公平和正义概念兼容。我们还可以问,在不牺牲太多公司效率的前提下,是否可以朝着公平或公正的关系改变脚本。在论文的后半部分,我将对公司效率的描述运用到公司的另一种政治理论中。我认为,应该限制我们的法律和政治制度,以保护公司的弱势群体,并鼓励所有权模式赋予那些进行最多个人投资的人以权力。我进一步认为,从商业道德的角度来看,应该将公司重新视为最大化效率的主体,同时还应成为减轻社会不公的主体。

著录项

  • 作者

    Singer, Abraham Andrew.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Toronto (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Toronto (Canada).;
  • 学科 Political science.;Economic theory.;Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 352 p.
  • 总页数 352
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号