...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Green growth or degrowth? Assessing the normative justifications for environmental sustainability and economic growth through critical social theory
【24h】

Green growth or degrowth? Assessing the normative justifications for environmental sustainability and economic growth through critical social theory

机译:绿色增长或退化?通过批判性社会理论评估环境可持续性和经济增长的规范依据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Scientists agree that changes in the organization of human society and economy are needed to stop the degradation of the natural environment. The most commonly proposed solution, green growth, has been increasingly criticized, but the offered alternative of degrowth has remained a marginal undertaking in academia and in practice. This article further develops the argument for degrowth. The article conducts a comparative analysis of the normative foundations of green growth and degrowth using frameworks from critical social theory. The analysis shows that green growth and degrowth work toward different normative ideals that are justified in different ways. The analysis shows that degrowth has a stronger normative justification than green growth and therefore, should be preferred. The article contributes to the debate about green growth and degrowth by establishing normative grounds for focusing efforts for environmental sustainability on degrowth rather than green growth. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:科学家们一致认为,需要进行人类社会和经济组织的变革以阻止自然环境的恶化。最普遍提出的解决方案,即绿色增长,已受到越来越多的批评,但在学术界和实践中,提供的替代性除腐方法仍然是一项边际事业。本文进一步发展了关于退化的观点。本文使用批判性社会理论的框架对绿色增长和退化的规范基础进行了比较分析。分析表明,绿色增长和衰退有助于实现以不同方式辩解的不同规范理想。分析表明,与绿色增长相比,退化的规范依据更强,因此应优先考虑。本文通过建立规范性基础,将环境可持续性工作的重点放在绿色增长而不是绿色增长上,从而为有关绿色增长和绿色增长的辩论做出了贡献。 (C)2018 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号