首页> 外文学位 >The design, development and evaluation of a Web-based tool for helping veterinary students learn how to classify clinical laboratory data.
【24h】

The design, development and evaluation of a Web-based tool for helping veterinary students learn how to classify clinical laboratory data.

机译:基于Web的工具的设计,开发和评估,可帮助兽医学生学习如何对临床实验室数据进行分类。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Veterinary students face the difficult task of learning to classify clinical laboratory data. In an effort to make this task easier, a computer and web based tool known as the Problem List Generator (PLG) was designed based on current literature dealing with learning theory and medical education which are reviewed in chapter 1. Chapter 2 describes the design and the development process for the PLG. The PLG allows the students to access any number of cases (determined by the professor) of increasing complexity which provide signalment, history, physical exam, and laboratory data for a number of patients. Using the PLG, students analyze the data, identify data abnormalities and mechanisms, arrange them in a problem list, diagnose the problem, and compare their problem list and diagnosis to an expert problem list and diagnosis. The PLG was evaluated using a four step evaluation process involving an expert review, one-to-one evaluations, small group evaluations, and a two-part field trial, and was evaluated in terms of clarity, feasibility, and impact. The PLG is usable, in terms of clarity and feasibility, though fixes are recommended. There is no evidence to infer, statistically, that the PLG has any effect on learning outcomes. However, trends in the quantitative data and logical inference based on the context of the evaluation suggest that the PLG might help students, particularly those of low and average ability to produce more accurate problem lists.
机译:兽医学生面临着学习对临床实验室数据进行分类的艰巨任务。为了使这项任务更容易,我们根据第1章中介绍的有关学习理论和医学教育的最新文献,设计了一种称为问题列表生成器(PLG)的基于计算机和Web的工具。 PLG的开发过程。 PLG允许学生访问复杂性日益增加的任何情况(由教授决定),这些情况可为许多患者提供信号,病史,体格检查和实验室数据。使用PLG,学生可以分析数据,识别数据异常和机制,将它们排列在问题列表中,诊断问题并将其问题列表和诊断与专家问题列表和诊断进行比较。使用四个步骤的评估过程对PLG进行评估,包括专家评审,一对一评估,小组评估和分为两部分的现场试验,并就清晰度,可行性和影响进行评估。尽管建议进行修复,但从清晰性和可行性来看,PLG可用。从统计上来看,没有证据表明PLG对学习成果有任何影响。但是,基于评估背景的定量数据和逻辑推断的趋势表明,PLG可能会帮助学生,特别是那些能力较低且中等的学生,他们可以提供更准确的问题清单。

著录项

  • 作者

    Danielson, Jared Andrew.;

  • 作者单位

    Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.;

  • 授予单位 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.;
  • 学科 Education Technology of.;Biology Veterinary Science.;Education Higher.;Education Curriculum and Instruction.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1999
  • 页码 160 p.
  • 总页数 160
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号