首页> 外文学位 >The road taken: A reinterpretation of Jeffersonian ideology in the context of the John Taylor-John Adams debate
【24h】

The road taken: A reinterpretation of Jeffersonian ideology in the context of the John Taylor-John Adams debate

机译:所走的道路:在约翰·泰勒-约翰·亚当斯辩论中重新诠释杰斐逊主义的思想

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In 1814, John Taylor of Caroline, Virginia, published An Inquiry into the Principles and Policy of the Government of the United States, a response some twenty years in the making to John Adam's A Defence of the Constitutions of Government of the United States of America. Adams responded to Taylor in a set of thirty-two letters. Historically celebrated as the philosopher of Jeffersonianism, Taylor provides access to the dominant American political ideology of the early nineteenth century, and a contrast to the discredited vision of Adam's federalism. An examination of Taylor's thought demonstrates a political vision which represented a reaction to Lockean atomism and a cooption of the rising tide of democracy in America. Taylor's promotion of an organic vision of society, sanctified by a historicism of three ages, rationalized the rule by southern planters. By tarring Adams with the stigma of Hamiltonianism, monarchism, and an aristocracy of bankers and stock manipulators, the Jeffersonians, were able to discredit a political vision, with a puritan ancestry whose manifestation in Massachusetts was decidedly democratic. At its core, Taylor's thought justified a society which was not only built on the back of slaves, but one which presumed a deference of the yeoman to the planter. As a result of this study, the democratic mantel traditionally associated with Jeffersonianism can be seen as successful rhetoric whose focus was power rather than the principles celebrated in the Declaration of Independence.
机译:1814年,弗吉尼亚州卡罗琳的约翰·泰勒(John Taylor)发表了《对美国政府的原则和政策的调查》,这是对约翰·亚当(John Adam)撰写的《捍卫美利坚合众国政府宪法》大约二十年的回应。 。亚当斯用三十二封信答复了泰勒。泰勒历来以杰斐逊主义哲学家而闻名,它为人们提供了进入19世纪初期占主导地位的美国政治意识形态的途径,并且与亚当联邦主义的vision贬不一形成鲜明对比。对泰勒思想的审视表明了一种政治观点,它代表了对洛克斯原子主义的反应和对美国民主浪潮的共同选择。泰勒提倡的社会有机观被三个时代的历史主义所神圣化,使南方种植者的统治合理化。杰斐逊主义者通过以汉密尔顿主义,君主制以及银行家和股票操纵者的贵族化耻辱对待亚当斯,从而能够以清教徒血统破坏政治视野,清教徒的血统在马萨诸塞州是绝对民主的。从根本上讲,泰勒的思想为建立一个不仅建立在奴隶制基础上的社会辩护,而且建立了一个将约曼奉献给种植者的社会。这项研究的结果是,传统上与​​杰斐逊主义有关的民主壁炉可以被视为成功的言论,其重点是权力,而不是《独立宣言》所倡导的原则。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bramhall, David Dempster.;

  • 作者单位

    Drew University.;

  • 授予单位 Drew University.;
  • 学科 American history.;Political science.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1999
  • 页码 325 p.
  • 总页数 325
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:48:12

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号