首页> 外文学位 >Giordano Bruno's geometry of language.
【24h】

Giordano Bruno's geometry of language.

机译:佐丹奴·布鲁诺(Giordano Bruno)的语言几何。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Giordano Bruno's writing is a striking example of geometry's explicit and implicit participation in language. His work demonstrates an attentiveness to the figurative; that is, to the figures of both classical rhetoric and Euclidean geometry. My dissertation investigates what is geometric of Bruno's language and what is rhetorical about his geometric diagrams. Through three "geometric readings" I demonstrate that certain geometric figures echo and complement Bruno's use of the figurative idiom.;Chapter One offers an historical overview of geometry in sixteenth-century Europe, and an assessment of Bruno's mathematical expertise. Here, I also account for the paucity of scholarship on Bruno's geometry and on the relationship between his language and his mathematics. In the body of the dissertation, I isolate three categories of geometric form---the curve, the angle, and the straight line---and three works by Bruno. In Chapter Two, I consider the "curvilinear tropes" of circumlocution, hyperbole, ellipsis, and parable in the Cena de le ceneri, arguing that ethical, cosmological, and theological principles are reflected in and emphasized by the geometric rhetoric of the dialogue. In Chapter Three, I examine the "angles" in Bruno's De gli eroici furori as expressed in tropes of contradiction (such as oxymoron) and in "axial" tropes (such as chiasmus) that revisit Bruno's philosophy of coincidentia oppositorum . In the fourth chapter, I trace Bruno's critique of pedantic thought in the Candelaio through manifestations of rhetorical and conceptual "rectilinearity" in the tropes of listing and inversion.;In Bruno's writing, word and image intersect and clamor for recognition. To expand our understanding of Bruno's philosophical thought, we must articulate this intersection. In so doing, we also open a door onto the larger question of how geometry contributes to the rhetoric of argumentation and literature as a whole. In my Conclusion, I draft a theory for the "geometric reading" of literature, outlining the metaphoric geometry that is present in all forms of literature.
机译:佐丹奴·布鲁诺(Giordano Bruno)的著作是几何学对语言的显式和隐式参与的一个鲜明例子。他的作品表现出对形象人物的专心;也就是古典修辞和欧几里得几何图形。我的论文研究了布鲁诺的语言是什么几何,以及他的几何图是什么修辞。通过三个“几何读物”,我证明了某些几何图形与布鲁诺对具象习语的使用相呼应并相辅相成。第一章概述了十六世纪欧洲的几何学,并对布鲁诺的数学专业知识进行了评估。在这里,我还解释了关于布鲁诺几何学及其语言与数学之间关系的学术研究很少。在论文的主体中,我分离出三类几何形式-曲线,角度和直线-和布鲁诺的三幅作品。在第二章中,我考虑了Cena de le ceneri中的割礼,夸张,省略和寓言的“曲线对位”,认为对话的几何修辞反映并强调了伦理,宇宙论和神学原理。在第三章中,我考察了布鲁诺的《反义词》中的“角度”,它们以矛盾的比喻(例如矛盾词)和“轴向”的比喻(例如希斯马斯)表示,它们重新审视了布鲁诺的巧合哲学。在第四章中,我通过列举和倒置的比喻中的修辞和概念“直线性”的表现,追溯了布鲁诺对坎德拉奥的学究思想的批判;在布鲁诺的著作中,单词和图像相交而喧嚣以至于得到认可。为了扩大我们对布鲁诺哲学思想的理解,我们必须阐明这一交集。这样一来,我们也为更大的问题打开了一扇门,这个问题是几何学如何促进论证和整个文学的言论。在我的结论中,我起草了文学“几何阅读”的理论,概述了所有形式的文学中都存在的隐喻几何。

著录项

  • 作者

    Saiber, Arielle.;

  • 作者单位

    Yale University.;

  • 授予单位 Yale University.;
  • 学科 Literature Romance.;History of Science.;Language Rhetoric and Composition.;Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1999
  • 页码 241 p.
  • 总页数 241
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号