首页> 外文学位 >The place of history in Platonic philosophy: The consequences for history of Plato's middle dialogues.
【24h】

The place of history in Platonic philosophy: The consequences for history of Plato's middle dialogues.

机译:历史在柏拉图哲学中的位置:柏拉图中间对话历史的后果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The limited instances in the Platonic corpus where Plato treats of history, and the limited number of scholarly works which treat of the relationship of Platonic philosophy to history, tend to provide a view of Plato as a theoretician whose work is antithetical to the use and purpose of history as a science. These arguments are generally made with the primary support of a consideration of Platonic epistemology and metaphysics, which prioritize the value of unchanging eternal entities, i.e. Forms, and discount as unproductive of knowledge any consideration of sensible objects. These arguments are secondarily buttressed by subsuming historical inquiry and historiography under the other types of intellectual activities Plato is most outspoken against, such as, poetry, sophistry, and rhetoric.;The following project has two aims. First it proposes to clarify those elements of Plato's doctrines which support such an attribution of a negative view towards history, by examining Plato's middle dialogues, where such positions are first formulated and presented. Following this clarification, such an interpretation of Platonism will be shown to be open to challenge on account of a number of tensions in the Platonic corpus which would belie attributing such an a-historical or anti-historical point of view to Plato. If Plato is primarily concerned with effecting positive moral and social change in his own people, then it is incorrect to argue that he cannot have an interest in the affairs of man because of his ontic and epistemic beliefs, as they are variously expressed in his dialogues. Also, there is an important conflict between Platonic theory, as it can be extracted from his writings, and the actual use and awareness of human history and historical science which is also to be found in Plato's writings. A careful study of these conflicts will lead to a revaluation of the Platonic attitude to history, one which views Plato as a thinker who is not necessarily negatively disposed to such types of inquiry. This project then will examine three topics of Plato's middle period thought in relation to the possibility of historical science: (1) Plato's epistemology in the Meno and Phaedo, (2) the ontology of the Republic, (3) his views on the function and value of poetry, rhetoric, sophistry, and writing in the Republic , Gorgias, Menexenus, and Phaedrus.
机译:在柏拉图语料库中,柏拉图对待历史的情况有限,而处理柏拉图哲学与历史的关系的学术著作数量也有限,这往往使柏拉图成为理论家的观点,认为柏拉图的工作与使用和目的是对立的。历史作为一门科学。这些论点通常是在对柏拉图认识论和形而上学的考虑的主要支持下提出的,柏拉图认识论和形而上学将不变的永恒实体(即形式)的价值放在优先地位,而将任何对明智对象的考虑都视作对知识的生产无效。其次,通过将历史探究和史学归入柏拉图最直言不讳的其他类型的智力活动之下来支持这些论点,例如诗歌,诡辩和修辞学。以下项目有两个目标。首先,它建议通过研究柏拉图的中间对话来阐明柏拉图学说的那些要素,这些要素支持这种否定观点对历史的归因。澄清之后,由于柏拉图语料库中的许多紧张关系,柏拉图主义的这种解释将被证明是具有挑战性的,这将柏拉图这种非历史的或非历史的观点归因于柏拉图。如果柏拉图主要关心如何在其本国人民中实现积极的道德和社会变革,那么就说他对人的事务不感兴趣是不正确的,因为他的本体论和认识论信念在他的对话中得到了不同表达。 。同样,柏拉图理论(可以从他的著作中提取)与人类历史和历史科学的实际使用和认识之间也存在着重要的冲突,后者也可以在柏拉图的著作中找到。对这些冲突的认真研究将导致对柏拉图式的历史态度的一种重新评估,这种态度将柏拉图视为一种思想家,不一定对这种类型的探究产生消极的态度。然后该项目将研究柏拉图中期思想与历史科学可能性有关的三个主题:(1)柏拉图在<斜体>斜体和<斜体> Phaedo 中的认识论,(2) Republic 的本体论,(3)他对 Republic Gorgias 的诗歌,修辞,诡辩和写作的功能和价值的看法, Menexenus Phaedrus

著录项

  • 作者

    Al-Nakeeb, Mustafa Shaheen.;

  • 作者单位

    State University of New York at Buffalo.;

  • 授予单位 State University of New York at Buffalo.;
  • 学科 Literature Classical.;History Ancient.;Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1999
  • 页码 349 p.
  • 总页数 349
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号