首页> 外文学位 >Optimal nitrogen and choice of reduced tillage systems for wheat production in north western Oklahoma.
【24h】

Optimal nitrogen and choice of reduced tillage systems for wheat production in north western Oklahoma.

机译:俄克拉荷马州西北部小麦生产的最佳氮素和减耕系统的选择。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Scope and method of study. Simulation data from the Erosion Productivity Impact Calculator Model (EPIC) and enterprise budget elaborated from the Oklahoma State University Budget Generator were used to study the long-term onsite and offsite effects of soil erosion on wheat production in Garfield County, Oklahoma. It was assumed that the farm has six soil types, and in each, the producer would choose for each of the 100 years of the planning period, a level of nitrogen application and one of four possible tillage systems. The study estimated the functions of erosion, yield, nitrogen carryover, and nitrogen loss functions per soil type. A discrete dynamic economic model was used to determine the private and social optimum rate of nitrogen application and choice of reduced tillage systems under different assumptions of market prices of wheat and nitrogen, cost of erosion and nitrogen loss, and discount rates. Because of the complexity inherent in using dynamic programming for this problem, the study developed a branching method, which is a simpler approach to solving for the optimal solution.;Findings and conclusions. It was found that the optimal tillage system was different from private versus social choice. The optimum rates of applied nitrogen were almost identical for the sweep systems, varying from 117 kg/ha to 132 kg/ha across all soil types. The corresponding rates were slightly higher for disk chisel. They varied between 124 kg/ha and 135 kg/ha. The plow system required much higher rates of nitrogen application that vary from 136 kg/ha to 145 kg/ha. The net present value of the disk chisel was higher than the other tillage systems for private optimization, and the net present value of sweep system twice was the highest for social optimization where the farmer is responsible for offsite damage costs of soil erosion. The optimal choice of tillage systems and resulting nitrogen application was not sensitive to changes in wheat and nitrogen prices, and discount rates for either private or social optimization. However, the optimum tillage sequence was sensitive to changes in the cost of erosion and nitrogen loss. A 50% reduction in these costs would make farm shift from using sweep systems to using disk chisel. The results imply that policies aimed at reducing soil erosion are bound to be less effective without internalizing the cost of offsite damages.
机译:研究范围和方法。使用俄克拉荷马州立大学预算生成器编制的侵蚀生产力影响计算器模型(EPIC)的模拟数据和企业预算,研究了俄克拉荷马州加菲尔德县土壤侵蚀对小麦生产的长期现场和非现场影响。假定该农场有六种土壤类型,在每种情况下,生产者将为计划周期的100年中的每一年选择氮肥水平,并选择四种耕作系统之一。研究估算了每种土壤类型的侵蚀,产量,氮素残留和氮素损失函数。使用离散动态经济模型来确定在不同的小麦和氮市场价格,侵蚀和氮损失成本以及折现率的假设下,私人和社会对氮的最佳施用量以及减少耕作制度的选择。由于使用动态规划解决此问题固有的复杂性,本研究开发了一种分支方法,该方法是求解最优解的一种更简单的方法。;发现和结论。发现最佳耕作制度不同于私人选择和社会选择。吹扫系统的最佳氮肥施用率几乎相同,在所有土壤类型中从117 kg / ha到132 kg / ha不等。圆盘凿的相应比率略高。它们在124公斤/公顷和135公斤/公顷之间变化。犁系统需要更高的施氮量,从136 kg / ha到145 kg / ha不等。盘式凿子的净现值高于其他耕作系统的私人优化,而扫地系统的净现值是社会优化的两倍,是社会优化的,农民负责土壤侵蚀的异地破坏成本。耕作制度的最佳选择和所施用的氮肥对小麦和氮肥价格的变化以及私人或社会优化的贴现率不敏感。但是,最佳耕作顺序对侵蚀和氮损失成本的变化很敏感。这些成本降低50%,将使农场从使用清扫系统转向使用圆盘凿。结果表明,旨在减少水土流失的政策在不将场外损害成本内部化的情况下,注定是效果较差的。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bocoum, Kolado.;

  • 作者单位

    Oklahoma State University.;

  • 授予单位 Oklahoma State University.;
  • 学科 Agricultural economics.;Soil sciences.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 124 p.
  • 总页数 124
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号