首页> 外文学位 >Tax accounting choice: The costs of corporate tax aggressiveness.
【24h】

Tax accounting choice: The costs of corporate tax aggressiveness.

机译:税务会计选择:公司税务积极性的成本。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study investigates corporate tax aggressiveness by experimentally examining whether differences in book and tax accounting methods, which are disclosed in corporate income tax returns, influence decisions to adopt aggressive tax positions. Moreover, given that a firm has adopted an aggressive tax position, this study examines whether the firms will reserve the financial tax benefit on the balance sheet. An experimental instrument was sent to corporate tax directors of U.S. firms. The manipulation in the experimental instrument was whether an aggressive tax position in a hypothetical scenario would [not] conform to the firm's financial accounting method. The tax directors indicated on the instrument how strongly they would recommend adopting the tax position in the scenario, and then assuming the tax position was adopted, how strongly they would recommend expensing or reserving the financial tax benefit.; Empirical tests indicate that subjects more strongly recommend adopting a conforming tax position than a nonconforming one. However, no relationship is found between the size of firms' book-tax differences, used to proxy for the size of firms' portfolio of aggressive tax positions, and their subsequent tax decisions. Tests of subjects' propensity to reserve the tax benefit indicate that conforming positions are less likely than nonconforming positions to be reserved, and public firms are more likely to reserve a tax cushion than private firms. Moreover, as aggressive tax portfolios increase, firms presented with a nonconforming tax opportunity were less likely to reserve the financial tax benefit than firms presented with a conforming tax opportunity.; This work extends the previous literature by directly examining firms' tax accounting choices as opposed to their financial accounting choices. Additionally, this paper tests the findings of several analytical works on tax accounting choices. While prior research has speculated that firms reserve tax cushions, this paper directly examines tax cushions and the factors that influence them.
机译:本研究通过实验检查企业所得税申报表中披露的账簿和税务会计方法的差异是否影响采用积极税收头寸的决定,从而研究了企业税收积极性。此外,鉴于一家公司采取了激进的税收政策,本研究考察了这些公司是否将在资产负债表上保留财务税收优惠。实验工具已发送给美国公司的公司税务总监。实验工具中的操纵是在假设的情况下激进的税收状况是否[不]符合公司的财务会计方法。税务总监在工具上指出了他们会建议采用哪种方案的程度,然后假设采用该税种,那么他们将会建议采用何种程度的费用来支出或保留财务税收收益。实证检验表明,与不合格者相比,受试者更强烈建议采用合格的税率。但是,在用来代替企业积极税收头寸的资产组合规模的企业账面税额差异与其后续税收决策之间,没有发现任何关系。对主体保留税收优惠的倾向性的测试表明,符合条件的职位比不符合条件的职位要保留的可能性要小,而与私人公司相比,公共公司更可能保留税收缓冲。此外,随着激进的税收投资组合的增加,具有不合格税收机会的公司比具有合格税收机会的公司保留金融税收优惠的可能性要小。这项工作通过直接检查企业的税收会计选择而非财务会计选择,扩展了以前的文献。此外,本文测试了有关税收会计选择的多项分析工作的发现。尽管先前的研究推测企业保留了税收缓冲,但本文直接研究了税收缓冲及其影响因素。

著录项

  • 作者

    Smith, Steven Howard.;

  • 作者单位

    Arizona State University.;

  • 授予单位 Arizona State University.;
  • 学科 Business Administration Accounting.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 57 p.
  • 总页数 57
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 财务管理、经济核算;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:47:50

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号