首页> 外文学位 >Authorizing romanticism: The grounding of poetic authority in the poetry of Wordsworth and Keats (William Wordsworth, John Keats).
【24h】

Authorizing romanticism: The grounding of poetic authority in the poetry of Wordsworth and Keats (William Wordsworth, John Keats).

机译:授权浪漫主义:华兹华斯和济慈(威廉·华兹华斯,约翰·济慈)诗歌中的诗意权威基础。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Poets of the Romantic period faced a crisis in poetic authority more severe than that experienced by any generation of English authors before them, as the Romantics acknowledged the possibility that poetry itself might have exhausted its resources and thereby reached its end. Wordsworth and Keats in particular reacted to this crisis by trying to establish a new grounding of poetic authority within their poetry, an attempt which they saw as tantamount to a rescuing of English poetry. This attempt to establish secure grounds for poetry informs the subject matter of much of their poetry and offers insight into the features of their poems and into their individual artistic methods. This study investigates how these two authors tried to achieve a firmer basis for poetic discourse within their major poems, particularly in Wordsworth's early works, the 1798 Lyrical Ballads and the 1805 Prelude, and in Keats's major allegorical narratives, Endymion and The Fall of Hyperion. This study also reexamines Wordsworth's important influence upon Keats: Wordsworth was Keats's most important living model, and no study of Keats's poetic authority is complete without an account of Wordsworth's pervasive influence upon him.; Wordsworth and Keats both negatively characterized eighteenth-century poetry, and the initial part of this study revisits the larger debate over eighteenth-century poetry which informed the relations between Wordsworth, Keats, Hunt, and Byron and shows how this debate fueled Byron's antagonism toward Keats. I subsequently demonstrate how Keats took up Wordsworth's early poetic ideal and made it his own, although he inevitably expressed it quite differently in his own poetic productions and transmuted it in his own artistic progress. Both poets wrestled with the paradox of Wordsworth's vision of a poetry grounded in reality itself rather than in the practice of past poets and the examples of specific textual models. Reading these two poets together is a useful check against reading Wordsworth solely according to his own prescriptions. By seeing how one of Wordsworth's best students, Keats, took up Wordsworth and eventually criticized the unifying vision that had initially spurred him on, we are better able to keep Wordsworth grounded as well.
机译:浪漫主义时期的诗人面临着诗歌权威的危机,这一危机比他们之前的任何一代英国作家所经历的危机都更为严峻,因为浪漫主义者承认诗歌本身可能会耗尽其资源并最终走向终结。华兹华斯和济慈对这场危机的反应特别是试图在他们的诗歌中建立诗意权威的新基础,他们认为这是挽救英国诗歌的尝试。这种为诗歌建立安全基础的尝试将其诗歌的大部分传达给主题,并为他们的诗歌特征和个人艺术方法提供了见识。这项研究调查了这两位作者如何努力在他们的主要诗歌中,尤其是在华兹华斯的早期作品,1798年的《抒情歌谣》和1805年的《前奏曲》中,为诗歌的话语奠定了坚实的基础,在济慈的主要寓言叙事中,Endymion和 Hyperion的衰落。这项研究还重新审视了华兹华斯对济慈的重要影响:华兹华斯是济慈最重要的生活模式,而且如果不考虑华兹华斯对他的普遍影响,就无法完成对济慈诗意权威的研究。华兹华斯和济慈都对18世纪诗歌具有消极的特征,并且本研究的第一部分回顾了关于18世纪诗歌的更大辩论,该辩论为华兹华斯,济慈,亨特和拜伦之间的关系提供了信息,并显示了这场辩论如何激起了拜伦对济慈的敌意。 。随后,我演示了济慈如何吸收华兹华斯早期的诗歌理想并将其变为自己的理想,尽管他不可避免地在自己的诗歌作品中表达了不同的想法,并在自己的艺术进步中对其进行了trans变。两位诗人都与华兹华斯对诗歌的看法的悖论发生了争执,而后者是基于现实本身而不是过去的诗人的实践和特定文本模型的实例。一起读这两位诗人是对仅根据他自己的处方读华兹华斯的有用检查。通过查看华兹华斯最优秀的学生之一济慈如何吸收华兹华斯,并最终批评最初激发他的统一愿景,我们也能够更好地保持华兹华斯的发展。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lowe, Derek.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Irvine.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Irvine.;
  • 学科 Literature English.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 306 p.
  • 总页数 306
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 I561;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:47:41

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号