首页> 外文学位 >Capital unbound: The rise and demise of European capital controls.
【24h】

Capital unbound: The rise and demise of European capital controls.

机译:无资本约束:欧洲资本管制的兴起和消亡。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In the two decades between 1973 and 1994, all European countries removed long-standing capital controls---national laws governing the flow of money and investment across borders. This raises two interrelated puzzles: why did European countries abandon controls? And why did some countries precede others in doing so? This dissertation goes against the widely held view that changes in the international environment made capital flows unmanageable and capital controls pointless. Instead it argues that government choice played a key role in capital decontrol, at least initially. Changes in the macroeconomic ideas held by decision-makers---the macroeconomic policy stance---produced a new control policy When governments shifted from a belief in the utility of government intervention (interventionism) to a belief in the efficiency of the market (liberalism), capital controls went from being a necessary bulwark to an inefficient hindrance---a transformation that resulted in their elimination.; This study traces the historical link between macroeconomic ideas and capital control policy in three cases (Germany, Great Britain, and France), each representing a distinct mode of transition to liberalism. In Germany, a determined group of liberal policy-makers crafted a macroeconomic strategy based on low inflation and respect for private investment, which produced a successful postwar recovery. Despite a brief interlude of interventionism in the 1960s, the deeply engrained commitment among some policy-makers to liberal policies overcame mixed support from the financial sector and made monetarism an attractive option during the economic crisis of 1973. Germany removed most of its controls years before other countries. In Great Britain, Keynesianism had no answers for the stagflation of the 1970s, which spawned strong domestic calls for liberalism from actors within financial markets. Because of its strong capital markets, Great Britain decontrolled early. For other countries with less powerful capital markets---represented by France---internal pressures for liberalism paled in relative importance to external pressures. These countries converted to liberalism only after renewed efforts at interventionism failed and pressure from the EC, Germany and private capital markets made controls unsustainable.
机译:在1973年至1994年这两个十年中,所有欧洲国家都取消了长期的资本管制制度,即管辖跨境资金和投资流动的国家法律。这引起了两个相互关联的难题:欧洲国家为什么放弃控制?为什么有些国家在其他国家之前这样做呢?这篇论文违背了普遍持有的观点,即国际环境的变化使资本流动难以控制,资本管制毫无意义。相反,它认为,至少在最初,政府的选择在资本管制中起着关键作用。当政府从对政府干预效用(干预主义)的信念转变为对市场效率的信念时,决策者所持有的宏观经济观念的变化-宏观经济政策立场-产生了新的控制政策。自由主义),资本管制从必要的堡垒变成了效率低下的障碍-导致其被淘汰的转变。这项研究在三个案例(德国,英国和法国)中追溯了宏观经济思想与资本管制政策之间的历史联系,每个案例都代表了一种向自由主义过渡的独特模式。在德国,一群坚定的自由派决策者制定了基于低通胀和尊重私人投资的宏观经济战略,从而成功地实现了战后恢复。尽管在1960年代短暂介入了干预主义,但一些决策者对自由政策的深深根深蒂固的承诺克服了金融部门的混合支持,并使货币主义成为1973年经济危机期间的诱人选择。德国在几年前取消了大部分控制措施其他国家。在英国,凯恩斯主义无法解决1970年代的滞胀,这引起了金融市场参与者从国内强烈要求自由主义。由于强大的资本市场,英国很早就放松了管制。对于其他以法国为代表的资本市场力量不足的国家来说,对自由主义的内部压力相对于外部压力显得相对重要。只有在新的干预主义努力失败并且欧共体,德国和私人资本市场的压力使控制变得不可持续之后,这些国家才转变为自由主义。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wurmser, Yoram Steven.;

  • 作者单位

    Columbia University.;

  • 授予单位 Columbia University.;
  • 学科 History European.; Economics Finance.; Political Science International Law and Relations.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2001
  • 页码 324 p.
  • 总页数 324
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 欧洲史;财政、金融;国际法;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号