首页> 外文学位 >Learning federalism: The experience of New Brunswick's 19th century judges.
【24h】

Learning federalism: The experience of New Brunswick's 19th century judges.

机译:学习联邦制:新不伦瑞克省19世纪法官的经验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This is a study of how New Brunswick judges interpreted the BNA Act in the first decades of Confederation. Particular attention is paid to The Queen v. Chandler (1869), to City of Fredericton v. The Queen (1979), and to the opinions of William Johnstone Ritchie in early constitutional cases of the Supreme Court of Canada. It concludes that constitutional adjudication in New Brunswick: opened deep fault lines in the province's legal culture on the relationship between legislatures and courts and the definition of constitutional law; produced a clash of constitutional visions based on different understandings of how confederation made federalism and the English constitution consistent; revealed the influence of a provincial rights understanding of confederation that linked federalism and constitutional interpretation to the protection of individual rights; produced indigenous understandings of the BNA Act that anticipated the achievements of provincial rights in Privy Council cases.
机译:这是对新不伦瑞克(New Brunswick)法官如何在联邦成立后的几十年中解释《 BNA法》的研究。尤其要注意的是女王诉钱德勒案(1869),弗雷德里克顿诉女王案(1979),以及威廉·约翰斯通·里奇(William Johnstone Ritchie)早期的观点。加拿大最高法院的宪法案件。结论是,新不伦瑞克省的宪法裁定:在该省的法律文化中就立法机关和法院之间的关系以及宪法的定义开辟了深层的断层线;基于对联邦如何使联邦制和英国宪法保持一致的不同理解,产生了宪法观念上的冲突;揭示了省级对联邦的权利理解的影响,这种理解将联邦制和宪法解释与保护个人权利联系在一起;对《国民经济核算法》产生了土著的理解,预见了枢密院案件中省级权利的成就。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    University of Toronto (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Toronto (Canada).;
  • 学科 Law.; History Canadian.
  • 学位 LL.M.
  • 年度 2001
  • 页码 253 p.
  • 总页数 253
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 法律;加拿大;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号