首页> 外文学位 >Spatial representation in comparative education and geography: A social cartography analysis.
【24h】

Spatial representation in comparative education and geography: A social cartography analysis.

机译:比较教育和地理学中的空间表征:社会制图分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The main purpose of this study is to bridge social cartography arguments in comparative education and maps/mapping/cartography arguments in geography by introducing the social cartography ideas to geographers, opening discussion about social cartography among them, and promoting knowledge exchange between comparative educators and geographers in the near future. To these ends, the study is organized around three research questions: (1) What is social cartography? (2) How can the relationships between the metaphorical maps of social cartography and the realist maps of geographic cartography be visually represented? (3) What potential does social cartography have for geographic studies?;In terms of their ontology/mapping method/style differences, social cartography and geographic cartography look very different and seem to be incommensurable. However, using metaphorical mapping methods, these differences may not only be comparable, but also mutually understandable. In this study, I focus on the common nature of being "maps", i.e., the use of metaphor and communication. I show visually that because the maps of social cartography and geographic cartography are not so radically different, an opening of knowledge exchange between arguments of both sides may be possible.;In addition, to illustrate the opportunity for opening further dialogues between comparative educators and geographers concerning arguments about maps, I pose two concise exercises to show the use of social cartography in geographic studies. Using these examples, I show that social cartography ideas may be useful in the following geographic study contexts: (1) clarifying the contentions of the study; (2) appealing to stakeholders to join the arguments concerning an issue; (3) showing the prospective distances between, and barriers to having, discussions with others; (4) facilitating in-depth interviews with actors; and (5) helping to revise the organization of study during research.
机译:这项研究的主要目的是,通过向地理学家介绍社会制图思想,展开有关社会制图的讨论并促进比较教育者与地理学家之间的知识交流,在比较教育与地理学中的地图/制图/制图学论证之间架起桥梁。在不远的将来。为此,本研究围绕三个研究问题进行组织:(1)什么是社会制图? (2)如何直观地表示社会制图的隐喻图和地理制图的现实图之间的关系? (3)社会制图学对地理学研究有何潜力?;就其本体论/制图方法/风格差异而言,社会制图学和地理制图学看起来非常不同,而且似乎不可估量。但是,使用隐喻映射方法,这些差异不仅可以比较,而且可以相互理解。在这项研究中,我专注于成为“地图”的普遍性,即隐喻和交流的使用。我从视觉上表明,由于社会制图和地理制图的地图并没有太大的不同,因此有可能在双方争论之间开启知识交流。;此外,为了说明在比较教育者和地理学家之间展开进一步对话的机会关于地图论证,我进行了两个简明的练习,以说明社会制图在地理研究中的使用。使用这些示例,我证明了社会制图思想可能在以下地理研究环境中有用:(1)阐明研究的争论点; (2)呼吁利益相关者加入有关问题的论点; (3)显示与他人进行讨论之间的预期距离和障碍; (4)促进与演员的深入访谈; (5)在研究过程中帮助修改研究的组织。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ito, Katsuhisa.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Pittsburgh.;

  • 授予单位 University of Pittsburgh.;
  • 学科 Education Social Sciences.;Sociology Theory and Methods.;Geography.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2001
  • 页码 253 p.
  • 总页数 253
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号