首页> 外文学位 >The impact of institutional and peer support on faculty research productivity: A comparative analysis of research vs. non-research institutions.
【24h】

The impact of institutional and peer support on faculty research productivity: A comparative analysis of research vs. non-research institutions.

机译:机构和同行支持对教师研究生产率的影响:研究机构与非研究机构的比较分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Across the landscape of American higher education, research has gradually established its dominant role in faculty work since the end of WWII—a paradigm shift yet to be fully studied and understood. Situated on their traditional locales on the spectrum stretching from pure teaching to heavy research, contemporary institutions all attempt to be involved in research activities. Research productivity, an essential contributor to the improvement of society and mankind, becomes the iconic indicator for institutional prestige, one of the vital resources any higher education institution requires for maintaining operation and facilitating development and growth. Responsively, an institutionalized recruitment and reward system unanimously sets the requirement for research productivity to allow faculty members to move through the academic pipeline. This study is aimed at identifying influential factors that may lead to higher research productivity at research and non-research institutions respectively by analyzing the data collected from the CAP (Changing Academic Profession) survey.;The logistic regression models have revealed four major findings. First, at research and non-research institutions, faculty collaboration with either domestic or international colleagues is essential for research productivity. Second, faculty collaboration with international colleagues is the best predictor of research productivity among all the factors included in the study (faculty professional characteristics, administration support research, peer support research). Third, faculty preferences in research lead to higher research productivity at research institutions, but not apparently at non-research institutions. Fourth, administration generally plays no role in improving research productivity; nonetheless, it may play a marginal role at non-research institutions if peer collaboration is neither counted nor present.
机译:自第二次世界大战结束以来,在美国高等教育领域,研究逐渐确立了其在教职工作中的主导地位,这种范式转变尚待充分研究和理解。从纯粹的教学到繁重的研究,频谱都位于其传统地区,当代机构都试图参与研究活动。研究生产力是社会和人类进步的重要贡献,已成为制度威信的标志性指标,制度威信是任何高等教育机构维持运营和促进发展与增长所必需的重要资源之一。作为回应,制度化的招聘和奖励制度一致设定了对研究生产力的要求,以允许教职员工能够顺利通过学术渠道。这项研究旨在通过分析从CAP(Changing Academic Profession)调查中收集的数据,分别确定可能导致研究机构和非研究机构更高的研究生产率的影响因素。Logistic回归模型揭示了四个主要发现。首先,在研究机构和非研究机构,与国内外同事的师资合作对于提高研究效率至关重要。其次,在与研究相关的所有因素(教师专业特征,行政支持研究,同伴支持研究)中,与国际同事的合作是研究生产力的最佳预测指标。第三,研究人员的偏爱导致研究机构的研究生产率更高,但非研究机构显然没有。第四,行政部门通常在提高研究效率方面不起作用。但是,如果不计算或不存在同伴协作,它在非研究机构中可能会发挥边际作用。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ju, Ming.;

  • 作者单位

    Seton Hall University.;

  • 授予单位 Seton Hall University.;
  • 学科 Education Administration.;Education Higher.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 147 p.
  • 总页数 147
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号